Is
It Worth It?
November
25, 2020
In 2019 the
cathedral Notre Dame de Paris was extensively, indeed nearly totally destroyed,
by fire. Notre Dame was a great treasure of French, European, and even world
culture. It brought together all of the elements of Gothic architecture for the
first time. It’s stained glass windows, especially the famous rose windows, are
beautiful beyond description and are utterly irreplaceable. Notre Dame has
stood on the Ile de la Cité in Paris for eight hundred years. It is a great monument
to European culture in the High Middle Ages. Even for people for whom its
religious function and the religious nature of the art with which it is filled
are not important, Notre Dame has been a magnificent symbol of Paris, of
France, and of the human spirit. As the news of the fire came in I thought the
entire structure had been lost. Thank God it wasn’t. It appears that Notre Dame
will be saved, although substantial risks of collapse or other damage remains.
The French government is committed to rebuilding Notre Dame, but that reconstruction
will cost an enormous amount of money. The French government has not finalized
the budget for the reconstruction, but experts say that the cost could well
exceed one billion dollars. That of course is an immense amount of money.
The question
naturally arises: Is it worth it? Think of how much else the French government
could do with that much money. Imagine the social ills it could address.
Imagine how French education could be enriched. Imagine how much health care
that much money could provide. Imagine the other cultural projects to enrich
the lives of the French people that money could finance. Think of the housing
it could build or the families it could feed. Imagine how it could reduce
French taxes. The list of other worthwhile things that money could do is
virtually endless. Few Europeans, including few French people, are religious
anymore. Notre Dame’s religious significance as a Roman Catholic cathedral
dedicated to the mother of Christ doesn’t mean much to most contemporary French
people. So why spend that much money to restore it? Why not just tear it down
and use the money for something else?
These questions remind
me of an experience I had when I was a young university student doing a year abroad
in Stuttgart, Germany, in the 1968-69 academic year. We are all young radicals.
We had wanted Gene McCarthy to be the Democrats’ nominee for president in 1968.
We hated Richard Nixon. We hated the Vietnam war. We were all radical social
liberals at least if not outright socialists. There we were in Germany
surrounded by the great monuments of Germany’s history and culture. There are
Gothic and baroque cathedrals everywhere. There are palaces of magnificent architecture
decorated with beautiful art everywhere. Most of the members of our group from
the Oregon State System of Higher Education thought those treasures were a
total waste of money. They said most people in the years when those things were
built were extremely poor. Huge amounts of money went into creating them. My
colleagues said think how many people could have been fed and housed with the
money that went into building those things. What a waste, they said.
I said no, it
wasn’t a waste at all. I said that these structures, especially the churches,
are magnificent expressions of the human spirit. I said they express the
yearning of the human spirit for something more, for an expression of the spiritual
heights to which the human being is capable of aspiring. I said that if we ever
lose our spirit of creation, our ability to create and appreciate beauty, to
strive for the transcendent, we will lose a great deal of what it is to be
human. Yes, I had to acknowledge, a lot of human needs could have been met with
the money that went into building those churches and palaces, but I believed
then and I believe now that human life would be immensely impoverished if we
were to lose our drive toward something higher, something more beautiful than
our ordinary lives, something even divine. That’s why I disagreed with my
friends in their dismissal of the value of the great monuments of the human
spirit that we saw in Europe that year.
I didn’t express
it this way then. I wasn’t the least bit religious then. I didn’t have the
education and experience with things spiritual then that I have now. Today I
say that what those great achievements of the human spirit express is our drive
toward the transcendent. Yes, the great Gothic cathedrals were built as much
for civic and political reasons as for religious ones. Still, they are
cathedrals. They are churches. Notre Dame de Paris is dedicated to the Virgin
Mary, the mother of Christ. Even the secular baroque buildings like palaces
give people a vision of heaven, a vision of a life better and more beautiful
than the lives they live. We would lose a lot if we ever lost our inherent human
drive toward the transcendent that those buildings express.
Today that drive
mostly gets expressed in different ways. There have been great places of
worship built in many religious traditions in modern times, but our drive
toward the transcendent mostly gets expressed in different ways. I was in Stuttgart
during that year abroad when the US landed two men on the moon and returned
them safely to earth. A lot of people were asking the same questions about that
project as my friends asked about the cultural monuments of Europe that we saw
that year. Was it worth the enormous cost? Think of all the good that could
have been done with the money we spent to go to the moon. Think of all the food
we could buy, all the housing we could build, all the education and medical
services we could provide. Of course it’s true. We could have done a lot in
those areas with the money we spent to go to the moon. Was going to the moon
worth it?
Yes, I say. Going
to the moon was worth it, and it was worth it for the same reasons that it was
worth it for Europeans of earlier times to build the Gothic cathedrals. It was
worth it because going to the moon was an expression of the human spirit always
to always accomplish more. Always to strive to reach beyond ourselves for what
is higher. Always to strive to transcend our reality and to reach for something
better, something higher. Building great cathedrals was an expression of that
inherent aspect of what it is to be human. So was going to the moon. So are our
efforts to disclose the secrets of the universe and of subatomic particles. So
is the work of poets, artists, musicians, philosophers, and all who seek to
create beauty and meaning in the world. Perhaps none of that feeds a single
hungry person, but all of that makes us human. All of that expresses our nature
as made in the image and likeness of God.
So yes. It’s
worth it. It’s worth it to rebuild Notre Dame. It is worth it to go to the moon
and to reach for the stars. It’s also worth it to do everything we can to
address the very real human needs of people in this country and around the
world that so often and so tragically are not met. The two realms of human
endeavor need not be mutually exclusive. We can do both if we just will. Both
are part of what it is to be truly, fully human. So let us reach for the stars
literally and figuratively in every area of human undertaking. Our call as
humans is to become fully human. We don’t do that by not creating beauty and
spiritual meaning. We don’t do that by not doing everything we can we can to
make life better for every human being. Yes, it’s worth it to rebuild Notre
Dame despite the enormous cost of doing so. Let’s never forget that striving
beyond ourselves is a core part of what it is to be human. So let’s strive. Let’s
be fully human. Let’s never let anything stop us from that sacred task.
No comments:
Post a Comment