Sunday, January 29, 2023

Journal rambling Jan. 29, 2023

 

This is some journal rambling I did on January 29, 2023. I’m not sure why I’m posting it here, but here it is.

 

I’m reading Jon Meacham’s book The Soul of America, The Battle for our Better Angels. I just started and haven’t read much of it yet, but boy to I have bone to pick with Meacham. He is painting far too rosy a picture of American history. He mentions Jefferson without saying he as a slaveowner. He mentions some of Jackson’s flaws but doesn’t go far enough in blasting him for them. He praises Teddy Roosevelt without saying that he was a God-awful imperialist. He praises Woodrow Wilson without calling the racist that he was. He quotes Eisenhower on leadership but doesn’t mention his reluctance to act on matters of civil rights. At least not yet he hasn’t done any of those things. Maybe he’ll get around to it, but so far he’s being way too much of Pollyanna for me.

Meacham quotes Adam Smith, Thomas Paine, and other Enlightenment optimists on the proposition that people are basically good. Smith says the successful won’t close the door after them to keep others out. Like hell they won’t! That at least was my first thought. But the question occurs to me: Just what is my opinion of humanity generally and humans individually? Are people basically good, or basically bad, or basically both? I think we are by nature naturally selfish. Our egos want us to look out for No. 1 and sometimes say to hell with everyone else. We are so distinctly created as centered selves that it is nearly impossible not to be self-centered. True fullness of life comes from overcoming self-centeredness, but very few people are ever able to do it. Fullness of life comes for living agape love, but human culture mostly pushes so strongly against that kind of living that relatively few people even know that there is a way of living that is not destructively self-centered. And yes, striving for fullness of life is also self-centered in a way. But there is a distinct moral difference between self-centered as being concerned only for oneself and being self-centered as a way of being concerned for others, for justice, for peace, for environmental protection, etc.

We subsist as centered selves. We cannot subsist any other way. That we do makes it more likely that we will do harm to others than that we will do good for others. The highest stage of human development is self-transcendence. That doesn’t mean we cease to be a centered self. We can’t cease being a centered self. It means living as a self out of oneself. Out of one’s ego. Out of one’s concern only for oneself. So very, very few people ever reach that stage of development.

Our dominant American culture says work to get yourself ahead and take your immediate family with you, but don’t worry much about anyone else. We’ve long idolized the “self-made man,” not realizing, or pretending that we don’t realize, that there is no such thing. Something like twenty-four hundred years ago Aristotle said humans are social animals. Of necessity we live in relationship with others. We can’t thrive without living in relationship with others. That should mean that we improve ourselves and our lives not by being selfish but by cultivating healthy relationships with others, relationships that benefit both ourselves and the other. Yet it seems to me that so few of us do it. Or at least, very few of us are intentional about doing it.

I've never been particular intentional about doing it myself except with my immediate family. I’m an introvert, or at least most of the time I’m an introvert. I don’t make friends easily. Essentially no one seeks me out as a friend, nor do I seek anyone else out as a friend. I’ve had friends. I married two of them. But I’ve been telling myself recently that my Irish Terrier Jake was the best friend I’ve ever had canine or human. Jake had no choice about living with me. Mercifully, that reality for dogs doesn’t seem to bother them. They create a pack with us and have no thought of doing anything else, or at least most of them don’t.

We humans always have a choice about being in intentional relationship with another person. We live of necessity in unintentional relationship with countless others, most of whom we never meet. I’ll never meet the people who created and built this computer I’m using right now, but I have a relationship with them. I’ll never meet the people who designed and built the roads I drive on so frequently, but I have a relationship with them. I’ll never meet the people who discovered and manufactured the prescription drugs I take every day, but I have a relationship with them. That’s why there’s no such thing as a self-made man. Rich people often think they got rich solely through their own efforts. They may have devoted immense efforts to getting rich, but they simply did not do it alone. As Donne so wisely said, “no man is an island.”

So much of the harm we do comes from our failure to understand and live into that truth. At least in the dominant American culture it is quite the cultural norm for people to claw their way to the top of some economic or political structure giving not one good God damn about the people they trample on the way up.

So I guess my basic conception of humans is that we are capable of being and doing good, but the odds are stacked against our being and doing good. Yes, the world has a great many good people. A very few are saints. Many are just decent folk who don’t intentionally harm anyone and are ready to help others as they are able. A great many others, however, don’t give a damn about anyone else. They’re perfectly willing to harm others to advance what they think are their own self-interests. They vote for politicians who they think will benefit themselves with no thought to whether or not those politicians will benefit society as a whole. There’s a reason “liberal” has become a dirty word among us. Those who want everyone to focus only on themselves or their own class or race have to put down people whose focus is broader as weak or a socialists who want to take people’s money away and give it to people who don’t deserve it. Many people consider the term “do-gooder” to be an insult. So many of us do being human so badly.

Then there are the instances in which people, usually but not always as part of a group of people, whether a small street gang or a whole nation, do such horrific things that we can hardly believe humans are capable of doing them. Some human being in an SS uniform shot all those Jews in Poland and the USSR. Some human being in an SS uniform opened the valve to gas a huge number of innocent people to death, and some other human being ordered him to do it. Someone shot all those people Stalin ordered to be shot. I read once of a Russian man whose regular job was to spend a regular work shift shooting people in the back of the head. Some human beings broke into the homes of Ukrainian peasants and stole the little bit of food they had so they would starve to death, and some other human beings ordered them to do it. Mao didn’t kill millions of people with is own hands. Other human beings did it for him. The Japanese soldiers who carried out the rape of Shanghai were human beings. Being human carries with it no insurmountable barrier to being a murderous monster.

Yet of course most of us by far are not murderous monsters. Most of us are just ordinary folk going about our lives trying to live as best we can and not intentionally harming anyone. But so many of us, myself included, live privileged lives as beneficiaries of systems of oppression and even genocide. I’ve never killed a Native American, and I never will. But it was Americans of European heritage like me who carried out a policy of theft, violence, and oppression against Native Americans that really did amount to genocide. I’ve never dropped an atomic bomb on anyone, and I never will. My father never did either, but he may have survived World War II because someone else did.

People like me like to think of ourselves as so innocent, but we really aren’t. I live in a country that makes up something like 3% of the world’s population but consumes something like 25% of the world’s resources. Just being an American with privilege makes me guilty because I benefit from so much wrong. I am a white American who benefits every day from my country’s history and present reality of virulent racism. I live on land my white ancestors stole from Native people. I buy products made in countries with low wages so I can afford them and someone else can make a lot of money off of them.

When I stop to think about what it is to be human, it all gets awfully depressing. Yes, there is a lot of good in the world, though we don’t hear about it nearly as much as we hear about all the bad. We see horrific video of police officers beating Tyre Nichols to death. We don’t see video of police officers actually helping the people they supposedly are there to help. Yes, there is a lot of good in the world. But the amount of bad in the world can just be overwhelming. How can we humans do so much harm to other humans, to other living beings, and to the earth itself? Most of us don’t want to do any harm at all, but we do it nonetheless. And most of us Americans don’t even know all the harm our levels of affluence cause in other parts of the world.

So are human beings good? Or are we bad? The answer has to be, yes. We have so much potential in us both for good and for evil. Our call as humans is to avoid the evil and do the good. Many of us succeed in fulfilling that call, but many of us don’t. I guess the bottom line here is just that being a human being is a very complicated thing. Sadly, I don’t think it’s every going to get simpler.

 

Monday, January 9, 2023

The End of American Democracy?

 

The End of American Democracy?

January 9, 2023

 

Republicans now control the United States House of Representatives. They have elected representative Kevin McCarthy of California Speaker of the House, the person who stands third in line to the presidency of the United States. It took them fifteen ballots to do it, and to win, McCarthy had to convince six extreme Trumpist representatives to vote “Present” rather than vote against him. He was elected with only 216 yes votes, less than a majority of House members. It is not entirely clear how much McCarthy had to sell out to those six extremists (although I’m reluctant to call them that because McCarthy and nearly every Republican representative is an extremist in their own right) to get them not to vote against him. We do know at least that he agreed to a change in the House rules that will allow any representative to move at any time for the removal of the Speaker, something that would only tie up the House in a total waste of time and stop any constructive work from being done (not that I expect Republicans to do any constructive work in any event, which I don’t). It is clear that in order to satisfy his ego drive to be Speaker, McCarthy had to give the crazy extremists of his party essential veto power over all legislation. The Republican majority in the house is so small, 222 to 213, that five Republicans voting against any bill would stop it from passing as long as all Democrats also voted against it. In theory, I suppose, that gives some power to the Democrats, for if enough of them to offset the no votes of the Republican crazies voted for a bill, it just might pass. Still, as a practical matter, the six Republicans who voted “Present,” Biggs, Boebert, Crane, Gaetz, Good, and Rosendale, not Speaker McCarthy, will control what happens and what doesn’t happen in the House of Representatives for the next two years.

Because even the majority of the Republican representatives are themselves right-wing extremists, and because of the power of the “Present” six, the prospects for American democracy over at least the next two years are dire at best. The Republicans have all vowed to slash spending on Social Security and Medicare, vital programs for millions of Americans, myself included, that we all pay for our entire working lives. They have said that they will waste immense amounts of their time and our money investigating what they call the “weaponization” of the FBI and the Department of Justice. By “weaponization” they mean that those agencies have been doing their legal and constitutional jobs of investigating possible criminal acts by the Republicans’ baby, former president Donald Trump. Never mind that there is more than adequate evidence against Trump not just to justify but to demand such investigations. The FBI and DOJ are not acting politically in those investigations. The House Republicans will be acting politically, and despicably, when they conduct investigations of those agencies, investigations in support of which there is not one shred of objective evidence.

Yet that will probably not be the worst thing these House Republicans will do. There is one thing Congress must routinely do that Republicans have long complained about but in the end have done. It is to raise the federal government’s debt limit. Borrowing is the only way the federal government can pay its bills, a fact that results primarily from the way Republican Congresses and presidents have slashed taxes for wealthy people and corporations, something they have done every time they have had the chance since at least 1981. The debt is mostly the Republicans’ fault, but that doesn’t mean they will vote to allow the government to keep servicing it.

It is highly unlikely that this Republican-controlled House will vote to raise the federal government’s debt limit. Without an increase in the debt limit, the United States will have no choice but to default on the payments on prior national borrowing it is obligated to make and fail to make other payments it is legally required to make. When that happens, the US economy will collapse, probably at least to at least Depression-era levels. That will cause the entire world economy to collapse. The US federal government will essentially be unable to function at all. Failure to raise the national debt limit will have the effect of destroying the country’s national government.

That is precisely what the craziest of the Republicans want. Doing it is why they ran for Congress in the first place. It is why millions of ignorant Americans voted for them, something I am utterly incapable of understanding. Do that many Americans care about nothing but their own tax bill and say to hell with every other consideration? Apparently so. Do so many Americans either not care that their representatives refuse to condemn the seditious conspiracy Donald Trump led against the United States’ constitution and government that led to a deadly assault by Trump’s followers on the United States Capitol in an attempt to stop the peaceful transfer of power to the next duly elected president? Apparently not. Do so many Americans not care that their darling boy Donald calls white supremacists fine people and treats women as sex objects? Apparently not. Do so many Americans not care that their darling Donald cozies up to murderous dictators like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un and wants to be such a dictator himself? Apparently not.

All of these truths and many others create a situation in which the survival of our American form of democracy, such as it is, may well not survive much longer. If the Congressional Trumpists succeed in destroying our federal government, as they seem hellbent on doing, a right-wing, neo-fascist coup against that government and the constitution that creates it is a virtual certainty. The chaos and hardships that will result from the collapse of our government and constitution will lead millions upon millions of frightened Americans to welcome such a coup.

The inability of the Weimar Republic to cope with Germany’s problems in the late 1920s and early 1930s led to Hitler and his genocidal, militaristic, aggressive regime that got much of the world involved in the largest war in human history and killed tens of millions of people. The inability of the tsarist government to deal with Russia’s problems in the late 19th and early 20th centuries led to the Bolshevik coup of 1917 and the horror of Stalinist Communism that followed. Such a disastrous turn of events is, I fear, a real possibility that we face in the United States today.

It won’t do to say it can’t happen here, that we’re so different from other people that we would never do what they did. Our country was, after all, built largely through the enslavement and dehumanization of millions of Black human beings and genocide against the American Indians; and we remain a deeply racist culture to this day. We do, after all, maintain a military establishment orders of magnitude bigger than we need. We have, after all, been an imperialist country for most of our existence. We have, even in very recent times, conducted illegal wars of aggression and committed an untold number of murders around the world. The horror of a violent, dictatorial takeover of our country truly is a real possibility today.

Am I overreacting to ordinary politicians and ordinary political policies with which I don’t agree? I don’t think so. The Republican Party today is no longer a normal, legitimate American political party. It is a cult of personality beholden only to Donald Trump. Republican policies today are no longer ordinary, legitimate political policies. They are policies designed only to gain power for the sake only of power and to damage and even destroy the lives of millions upon millions of Americans. The Republican Party used to stand for small government, low taxes, and a large military establishment. Most Republicans no doubt still support those unfortunate policies, but those things are no longer what their party is primarily about. It is primarily about only two things—power for the party and power for Donald Trump. Because that is what the Republican Party has devolved to, it may very well lead to the destruction of American democracy. I pray that it will not happen, but as long as people keep voting for Republicans there is probably no way to stop it. It may, in fact, already be too late.