Sunday, June 30, 2013

The Empire Within

This is the sermon I gave on June 30, 2013, on Luke's story of the demon named Legion and Jesus' approach to dealing with the issue of empire.

The Empire Within
Rev. Tom Sorenson, Co-Pastor
June 30, 2013

Scripture:  Luke8:26-33

Let us pray:  May the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of our hearts be acceptable in your sight O God, our strength and our redeemer.  Amen.

The people who lived in what we call Israel in the first century CE, during the time that Jesus lived there, had a lot of problems, poverty being one of the dominant ones.  They had, however, one major problem that dwarfed all the others.  They lived under foreign military occupation.  Several decades before Jesus was born Rome occupied Israel.  Rome was at that time the greatest empire with the most powerful military establishment that the world had ever seen.  Like all empires ruling foreign lands Rome ruled for the benefit of Rome, not for the benefit of the people of the occupied land.  Israel got some benefits from Roman occupation I suppose.  The first century CE was a time of relative peace and of economic prosperity for the wealthy, albeit hardly for most of the people.  Yet the Jewish people, or at least most of them, hated Rome.  Rome exploited the land and the people economically, imposing harsh taxes that drove most of the people deeper into poverty.  Worst of all, the Romans were Gentiles.  They worshipped false gods.  They even worshipped their emperor, a mere human being.  For the Jews of the time it was an abomination for the followers of the one true God to be ruled and oppressed by infidels.  The Jews hated the Romans.  They wanted the Romans gone.  They rebelled violently against Rome several times, always with dire consequences when the Romans crushed the rebellion.  Liberation from Roman occupation was the great dream and hope of nearly all of the Jewish people.
Many of those Jewish people expressed that dream and that hope by talking about someone called the Messiah.  The Messiah was one who was to come and deliver Israel.  There were different understandings of the Messiah in circulation in Jesus’ time, but one of the major ones saw the Messiah as a new King David.  In this understanding he would raise an army and drive the Romans into the sea.  He would then reestablish the Davidic Kingdom, a long lost kingdom that the Jews had come to see as a golden age from the past and a model for liberation in the future.
Now, the Christian tradition has called Jesus the Messiah—or the Christ, the two words mean the same thing—from the very beginning.  That claim was a really hard sell to first century Jews.  It was a really hard sell because Jesus didn’t look, act, or talk anything like the Messiah so many of them were hoping for.  They wanted a Messiah who would make war on Rome and drive the Romans into the sea.  Jesus, of course, didn’t do that.  He didn’t try to do it.  He had no intention of ever doing it.  He just wasn’t that kind of Messiah. 
He wasn’t that kind of Messiah; but however one approached it Rome was Israel’s biggest problem, and any Messiah of whatever type had to deal with Rome and the Roman oppression of the Jewish people.  Any Messiah of whatever type had to give the people a way of dealing with Rome and the problems it created for them.  That, I believe, is what our story of Jesus and the exorcism of the demon named Legion is all about.  In that story we see how Jesus understood the problem of Rome and how to deal with it.
In that story a man is powerfully possessed by a demon.  The demon renders the man what we would call mentally ill.  The man couldn’t control himself.  Other people couldn’t control him either.  So Jesus comes along and exorcizes the demon out of the man.  Jesus asks the demon its name.  The demon says “Legion,” and Luke tells us that the demon’s name was Legion because many demons had entered the possessed man.  The demons get Jesus’ permission to enter a nearby herd of swine, who immediately rush into the Sea of Galilee and drown, taking the demons with them.
And you may be asking:  What does that story have to do with Rome?  The answer to that very legitimate question lies in the name of the demon, in “Legion.”  What does Legion mean?  That word has entered our language as a common word that means “a great many.”  Luke suggests that meaning of the word when he says that the demon’s name is Legion because many demons had entered the possessed man.  OK.  That explanation of the name Legion is fine as far as it goes.  The problem is that it doesn’t go far enough.  In the first century CE the word legion didn’t just mean many.  It had a related but quite specific other meaning.  Back then everyone who heard the story Luke tells would have known that a legion was a unit of the Roman army.  It was a major unit of the army, sort of like our army division, although not quite as big.  A legion consisted of three to six thousand infantry troops and one to two hundred cavalry troops.  To Jesus and his audience a legion represented the military might of the foreign power that occupied their land and oppressed them and their people.  Legion meant Roman power and Rome’s military occupation and tyrannical rule.
So in our story the name Legion represents the Roman empire.  It represents the ways of empire.  More broadly it represents the ways of the world.  Legion stands for the world’s dominant power, and it therefore stands for the world’s ways of violence and oppression.  It stands for all of the ways of the world.  It represents considering worldly power and success to be the highest values.  It represents seeing other people as objects rather than persons, objects for us to use, exploit, and abuse as we will to achieve our own selfish purposes.  It represents all of the ways in which the world stands for values contrary to the will of God.
In our story Legion isn’t literally a division of Roman soldiers.  It isn’t an external image at all.  It is an internal one.  In the story Legion isn’t the Roman military encampment outside the city, it is Rome internalized.  In this story demonic possession by Legion represents all of the things that Legion stands for taken inside and made part of a man’s life.  In this story the worldly values that Rome represents control the man who has taken them in.  He doesn’t control them, they control him.  The possessed man’s problem isn’t so much that the Roman Empire occupies his home country as it is that the Roman Empire occupies his soul.  His problem isn’t that Rome is out there.  His problem is that Rome is in here, within himself, controlling him not from the outside but from the inside.
In this story Jesus launches not a military assault on an external Rome but a spiritual assault on an internal one.  He doesn’t drive the external Roman army into the sea.  Metaphorically speaking, he drives the internal Roman army into the sea.  He doesn’t physically attack Rome’s soldiers.  Rather, he exorcizes the Roman legion that the possessed man has internalized.  He drives that Legion into the sea.  Jesus frees the man not from external occupation by Rome but from internal possession by Rome.  Jesus deals here not with imperial possession from outside but with imperial possession from inside.
In this story Jesus shows us where our adversary really lives.  Empire, and more generally the ways and values of the world, are a problem for us not because they exist outside of us.  They are a problem for us because they exist inside us.  They are a problem because we internalize them.  Our problem isn’t that the world’s ways are what they are.  Our problem is that we take the ways of the world into our hearts.  Our problem isn’t the ways of the world per se.  It is the way we have internalized the values and methods of the world and made them our own.  This story says that the world wins not so much through brute military power as it does by capturing our minds, hearts, and souls and by bending us until the world’s ways become our ways.
The story of Jesus’ exorcism of the demon named Legion calls us to look first of all not outward into the world to find evil.  It calls us to look inward, into ourselves, into our minds and our hearts.  Have the ways of the world that contradict and deny God’s ways taken possession of us the way Legion took possession of the man in our story?  Do we support the world’s ways of violence when we think we benefit from them?  Do we dehumanize any of God’s people, seeing them as objects rather than as beloved children of God?  Do we strive for worldly success measured in money and power rather than for the wisdom and peace that come from pursuing the life of the spirit? 

Let’s be honest.  We’ve all internalized at least some of the ways of the world.  It really isn’t possible to grow up in the world and not internalize an awful lot of it.  The world of Rome possessed the man in our story.  The world today possesses us.  Jesus exorcized Rome and its world from the man in the story.  We don’t have Jesus physically present with us to exorcize our world from us.  So this story calls us to do the work of exorcism ourselves.  Jesus calls us to look deep into ourselves.  What do we see there?  The ways of the world or the ways of God?  Jesus calls us to the immensely difficult work of replacing the world in our souls with God in our souls.  For Jesus, for God, we don’t transform the world through force and violence.  We transform the world by starting with ourselves.  When we transform our hearts, when we exorcize the world’s violent and unjust ways from our souls, we transform the world.  When enough people have, with the help of God, transformed themselves, the world will be transformed.  That’s why Jesus exorcized an internalized demon named Legion and didn’t raise an army to attack Rome.  He calls us to do the same.  Amen.

Together In the Spirit

This is the sermon I gave at my wife/co-pastor's installation service on June 22, 2013.

Together in the Spirit
Rev. Tom Sorenson, Co-Pastor
June 22, 2013

Scripture:  Romans 12:1-13; 1 Corinthians 12:1, 4-11

Let us pray:  May the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of our hearts be acceptable in your sight O God, our strength and our redeemer.  Amen.

So here I am preaching at the installation service for my co-pastor Jane.  It’s weird enough preaching at the installation of your co-pastor.  I suspect it is more common in these cases, or maybe I’d just be more comfortable, to have someone else preach a word to both of the new co-pastors. Yes, preaching at the installation of your co-pastor is a bit weird, but when that co-pastor is also your wife it gets really bizarre.  I am indeed Jane’s co-pastor here in Monroe, but much more importantly she’s my wife; and preaching specifically to your wife is just wrong, maybe especially when she’s a preacher too.  It got even worse the other day, however.  Jane suggested that I preach on 1 Corinthians 7:16a.  That half verse reads “Wife, for all you know, you might save your husband.”  Let’s just say I wasn’t much taken with that suggestion.  I suggested in response that I preach on the non-Pauline insertion into that same letter at 1 Corinthians 14:33b-34a:  “As in all the churches of the saints, women should be silent in the churches.”  Needless to say Jane didn’t like that suggestion any more than I liked hers.  Probably less.  It’s her installation, so I really had no choice.  I’m not preaching on that verse.  But then neither am I preaching on hers.
So what can I do here this afternoon?  I don’t feel right preaching specifically to my wife, even if she is my co-pastor.  Rev. Steve Hanning, my former pastor and recently the interim pastor at our church in Everett, told me once that he has known four clergy couples who did co-ministry together.  In two of those cases it worked really well.  In the other two—the couple got divorced.  I don’t want to say anything here that might increase the chances of Jane and me ending up in that latter category of divorced former co-pastors, so I won’t presume to preach specifically to Jane.  Instead I want to say a word to our people here in the Monroe church.  The rest of you, our honored guests here this afternoon, are of course welcome to listen too.
Today we formalize and celebrate your decision to call Jane as co-pastor, together with me, of your church.  Last August we changed our pastoral staffing by adding Jane as co-pastor, but back then adding Jane was only an experiment.  We all wanted to see how having Jane as co-pastor with me would work.  We needed to see, among other things, if you were able and willing to pay the added expense of adding another pastor to the staff, even at a very modest compensation level.  That experiment was set to end at the end of May, but on Pentecost you voted to make the co-pastor arrangement with Jane and me permanent—as permanent, that is, as a church’s pastoral arrangements ever are. 
I’ve got to be frank with you.  That decision, as much as I appreciate it—and I really do—makes absolutely no sense.  That’s what the so-called experts would say.  They’d say we’re not really big enough for even one full time pastor.  We’re nowhere near big enough for a staff of more than one full time pastor.  Any consultant we might have hired to evaluate the co-pastor proposal for us would have said you’re nuts to do it—in much more professional language of course.  We wouldn’t be very happy paying for just “you’re nuts.”  Yet somehow, by the grace of God and your good will, we’ve had a full-time pastor since 2003; and since last August we’ve had more than that.  You have supported the new pastoral arrangement with your prayers, your work, and your money; and Jane and I thank you for that support with all our hearts.  You have shown what a small church that once was stagnant if not quite near closing can do with the dedication, hard work, and contributions of committed members.
And now we come to a celebration of a new phase in our life together.  You have called Jane to join me as pastor because you know her, you love her, you see her manifold gifts for ministry.  You see what she can bring to our church, and that is a very good thing.  Today we get to celebrate your decision, and we also need to recognize what that decision means for the future of our church.  The new co-pastor arrangement that you have created presents us with both great opportunities and great challenges.  With Jane as co-pastor we have the opportunity to expand the ministry of our church beyond what I have been able to do as sole pastor.  We have pastoral support for parts of the church’s ministry that, frankly, I didn’t spend as much time on before as I might have—outreach and Christian education of children and young people being good examples.  We have an expanded availability of pastoral care.  Some of you relate to Jane better than you do to me.  Others of you relate better to me than you do to Jane.  That is natural and expected, and now you all have a better chance of having a pastor you are comfortable talking to.  Jane brings new ideas to the church.  She brings new energy.  Her pastoral experience is very different from mine; so she sees things differently than I do, and her insights have been and will be of great value to us.  Jane’s presence with us opens great new opportunities before us.
It also, however, presents us with challenges.  Jane and I are still working out just how we share the pastoral responsibilities around here, and how we do that will continue to evolve in the times ahead of us.  So far our being co-pastors has in no way threatened our marriage, and Jane and I will make sure that it never does.  One of your challenges is to understand that for Jane and me our marriage comes first.  If our pastoring together ever even remotely threatens our marriage, we’ll choose our marriage over co-pastoring.  Some of the time Jane and I have together sounds a lot like a pastoral staff meeting.  So far that’s OK.  We will make sure that it continues to be OK.
Yet the greater challenge that we face is understanding just where this church is heading.  Where is the Holy Spirit calling us?  We believe that the Holy Spirit has called Jane to ordained pastoral ministry here at Monroe Congregational UCC at this time.  We must presume that the Spirit has some purpose in calling Jane as one of your pastors today.  What is that purpose?  Is it to work Jane into the life of this congregation as essentially my successor as your pastor?  Perhaps.  She is thirteen years younger than I am, and I have been your pastor for over eleven years.  I’m 66 years old, and I won’t keep working forever.  Jane as my successor isn’t set in stone, but it’s something to keep in mind.  Is it because Jane will have new ideas for new types of ministry we can do in this community?  Perhaps.  I hope so.  We’ve come a long way in the last eleven years.  Is the Spirit calling Jane to lead us in building on the work we’ve done together in that time, to take us to new places reaching new people?  Perhaps.  I hope so. 
Discerning the Holy Spirit’s purpose in calling Jane as your co-pastor is an important challenge, but in our Scripture readings this afternoon St. Paul reminds us of another important truth about our church.  In both of those passages Paul speaks of how Christians have many gifts, all given by the one Spirit.  He doesn’t talk much there about the gifts of a community’s leaders.  He talks about the gifts of the people.  It is the gifts of the people, not just the gifts of the leaders, that make a church a faithful community of Christ’s disciples.  We don’t all have the same gifts, he says.  Just as a body needs different appendages and organs to function as a body, so a church needs the many different gifts to function well as a church.  You have two pastors.  That’s an extra pastor for a church this size.  One of your most important challenges is to remember that having an extra pastor doesn’t free you from the call to bring your gifts to the life of the church.  You don’t get to sit back and say Tom and Jane can do it.  We can’t.  We can help, and we will; but we can’t do much of anything without you.  You are the church.  Jane and I are part of the church too, but only a part of it.  Jane has many gifts for ministry.  I like to think that I have some too, but you are the church.  Your gifts are the ones that matter most.  Together we can do many good things.  Alone Jane and I can really do nothing.
So today, as we celebrate the installation of Jane as co-pastor, I ask you to consider not what Jane and I can do for you but what you can do for yourselves and each other as this little church of Jesus Christ.  Do you love children?  Volunteer in the nursery or the Sunday school rooms.  Do you care about the poor and the homeless?  Volunteer with Brown Bag Brigade, or Take the Next Step, or the food banks in Monroe and Sultan.  Can you sing, or do you like to sing but aren’t sure how good you are at it?  Come to choir practice on Wednesdays at 6:30.  Do you have a strong speaking voice?  Volunteer to serve as lay leader for our Sunday worship.  Are you a teacher?  Offer a class at church on something you have a passion for, either for children, or for adults, or for both.  Are there things you’d like to see us doing?  Do you have a vision for what our church could be but you don’t know how to make it happen?  Share your ideas and your vision.  Share them with Jane, with me, and with all the people of the church.  Maybe together we can make them real. 

The examples of gifts and how to use them could go on and on.  The Spirit has indeed given us many gifts.  Today we celebrate Jane, and it is right and good that we do.  We face many challenges together, not the least of them financial.  But we have overcome harder challenges in the past.  Those challenges became opportunities for faithful ministry.  The challenges we face today can be opportunities too.  If together we pray hard and rely on God’s grace, we can do great things.  With Jane’s new leadership, and with my old leadership, let’s get on with it.  Amen.