Friday, July 24, 2020

Fascist police tactics


This is the text of a letter I sent to the Everett Herald, a local newspaper in my area:

The Trump administration is using fascist police tactics in Portland. Federal officers with no identification and using unmarked vehicles are arresting people on the streets of Portland without probable cause to believe that those people have committed any crime. They are using violence against peaceful demonstrators. Neither the City of Portland nor the State of Oregon has asked them to be there and both have in fact told them to leave. The State of Oregon has brought suit against the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to force them out. At first these unidentified federal troops may have been called in to protect federal property, but that is not what they are doing now. I never thought I would see federal officers acting like Mussolini’s black shirts or Hitler’s brown shirts, but that’s what these armed but unidentified men are doing. Every last American should be as angry about what is happening as they can be. We should all be afraid of the Trump administration turning America into a fascist state. We can vote Trump out of office in November. If we don’t I hate to think what my country will look like four years later. It won’t be pretty. It won’t be America.

Rev. Dr. Thomas C. Sorenson

Tuesday, July 21, 2020

It's Not About Heaven and Hell


It’s Not about Heaven and Hell

Psalm 30:9

We all know what Christianity is about, don’t we? It’s about saving your soul from hell, from an eternity of fiery agony because you’re such a bad person. It’s about accepting Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior so your soul will spend a blissful eternity inside those pearly gates walking those golden streets. (Just who would use gold to pave streets escapes me, but never mind.) There is no doubt that that is what Christianity came to be mostly about. Catholics and Protestants may give slightly different answers to the question of how we avoid hell and gain heaven, but avoiding hell and gaining heaven is what both varieties of Christianity are about, right? So for that matter is the third big variety of Christianity, eastern Orthodox Christianity. Ask almost anyone at all familiar with Christianity today and they’ll say right, that’s what Christianity is about.

The critics of Christianity, the nonbelievers, mock Christians for their conviction that their faith is about heaven and hell. All your superstitions are about is an expected afterlife, they say. You’re scared of hell. Your faith is grounded in fear of a vengeful God who’s going to let you have it after you die because you’re such terrible people! You believe, or pretend to believe, just because you’re scared. What the hell kind of faith is that? You don’t even know for sure that there is an afterlife or that heaven and hell are real. Stop living in fear! That’s no way to live, but it’s all your precious Christianity is about. Get over it!

Many of us know that gaining heaven and avoiding hell really isn’t what Christianity is about at all, but it’s easy to see how a great many people, both Christians inside the churches and people outside them, can believe that faith is indeed grounded in fear about an afterlife. Since at least the fourth century CE when Christianity became the established state religion of the Roman Empire the official voices of the faith have diverted people’s attention away from worldly issues of peace and justice toward an afterlife the nature of which depends on what you did or didn’t do in this life. They’ve told people you have to believe what we tell you to believe, do what we tell you to do, and not do what we tell you not to do or else, as the Gospel of Matthew says in a few places, you’ll be cast into a furnace of fire where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For centuries the most visible forms of Christianity have indeed been grounded in fear.

Yet fear of eternal suffering isn’t at all what Jesus was about. It isn’t at all what Christianity was originally about either. One good way to see that that isn’t what the faith was about is to consider the understanding of an afterlife in Christianity’s mother faith, ancient Judaism. Ancient Judaism had an understanding of sorts of an afterlife, but it didn’t include any notion of heaven and hell. We see what that great faith thought about the afterlife at Psalms 30:9. In that verse the psalmist says to God:

 

‘What profit is there in my death,

     if I go down to the Pit?

Will the dust praise you?

     Will it tell of your faithfulness?

 

“The Pit.” Sometimes the texts call it Sheol. In ancient Jewish faith it was everyone’s fate after death. It is a sort of shadowy place of pseudo-existence. It isn’t complete nonbeing. It isn’t quite nothingness, but it isn’t really life either. There is no judgment in it. It’s where everyone goes. Whatever form we may have there, we can’t actually do anything. Most of all we can’t praise God. The psalmist of Psalm 30 pleads with God to save his life so that he can continue to praise God, something he won’t be able to do after death.

Christianity developed out of a faith with that conception of the afterlife. In that way of thinking there is nothing we need to do to secure a blissful afterlife nor anything we must do to avoid a tortuous one. In Christianity’s mother faith life wasn’t about an afterlife at all. The righteous weren’t better off after death than were the unrighteous. In some ancient Jewish thought there was the idea that the righteous are rewarded and the unrighteous punished, but that reward and that punishment happened in this life not in some next life. See for example Deuteronomy 30:15-20. Christianity’s faith of origin had no conception of post-death judgment with heaven or hell as a consequence of how one had lived life on earth. Original Christianity didn’t either, or at least gaining heaven and avoiding hell was not its principal focus. Living the way God wants us to was the faith’s primary focus, but the purpose of living right wasn’t to avoid hell. Christianity originally called us to proper living not to gain heaven but as a faithful response to God’s grace.

So where did the Christian focus on gaining heaven and avoiding hell that we’re all so familiar with come from? It was a consequence of the establishment of the faith as the official religion of the Roman Empire in the fourth century CE. When we focus on this life the way Jesus calls us to we are primarily concerned with peace and with economic justice for the poor. Empires ancient and modern (whether they call themselves empires or not) don’t like people being primarily concerned with those things. They don’t like it when people condemn their violence and call them to the ways of peace. Empires ancient and modern are based upon a radical inequality of wealth. They benefit a wealthy few at the expense of the masses of people all or most of whom are poor. Empires don’t like it when people demand justice for the disadvantaged the way Jesus did. Empires ancient and modern have no use at all for Jesus’ social and economic teachings.

In the fourth century CE the Christian church became the official church of the Roman Empire. The church reveled in its newfound lofty position of power and wealth. It sure didn’t want anyone annoying the emperor and his minions by condemning violence and demanding economic justice. So it began to tell people not to worry too much about those things beyond perhaps doing charity as a response to people’s need. Worry instead about the eternal fate of your soul after this life. Focus on gaining heaven and avoiding hell. It told people they did that by believing the right things and living the right way, but living the right way became a purely personal matter. Don’t steal. Don’t commit adultery. Don’t lie or cheat others. Do what the church tells you to do. Do what the emperor tells you to do and don’t worry about whether that is moral or not. The churchmen said God had established the Christian empire, so to obey the empire is to obey God. What the empire is actually doing is not your concern. Read Romans 13:1-7 they said, and be obedient. Don’t try to end suffering in this life. Worry about eternal suffering in the next one.

Now, it is true that a promise of a blissful life in heaven after death can be a powerful message of comfort and hope for people who are doing nothing but suffer in this life. We mustn’t deny the power of that message for many people. Yet if grace is truly grace (and it is) that blissful afterlife isn’t anything we need worry about. It is God’s free gift for everyone. We need not live in fear of hell. Pope Paul VI said that he believed that hell is real but he wasn’t sure anyone was in it. Many of us Christians today go one step further and say hell isn’t even real. Beyond that we know that heaven and hell were not what Jesus was mostly about. He called us to live the values of the kingdom of God in this life to be sure, but he didn’t do that so we could gain heaven. We do it just to be faithful to the God who loves each and every one of us unconditionally. Yes, Matthew sometimes speaks about people being thrown into a furnace of fire or an outer darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, but nearly no one else in the New Testament talks that way. Jesus surely didn’t. Christianity really is mostly about peace and justice in this life not about heaven and hell in a next one.

So don’t let the cynics harm your faith. Christianity isn’t about heaven and hell. Don’t live in fear of a judgmental and vengeful God the way so many Christian preachers want you to. God isn’t judgmental or vengeful. God is love as 1 John says. God is infinite grace, infinite forgiveness. Our faith isn’t about heaven and hell. So let’s get on with living the kingdom life to which God calls us, and let’s do it not because we’re afraid but because we’re responding to love with love. May it be so.

Monday, July 13, 2020

Why Do We?


Why Do We?
July 14, 2020

It’s one of my favorite passages in the Bible, although for some reason it startles me every time I read it:

Ho, everyone who thirsts,
       come to the waters;
       and you that have no money,
              come, buy and eat!
Come buy wine and milk
       without money and without
              price.
Why do you spend your money
              for that which is not bread,
       and your labor for that which
              does not satisfy? Isaiah 55:1-2a.

Those profound words come to us from the mid-sixth century BCE, over twenty-five hundred years ago from an otherwise unknown prophet scholars call Second Isaiah, yet they sound like they could have come from some wise sage only yesterday. They originally spoke to ancient Hebrew people in forced exile and captivity in Babylon, but they speak to us today as powerfully as they did to those people so very long ago. They speak to what used to be a major issue in my life. They speak to what is a major issue in the life of my country. When I think back on my life, in particular my work life, I see that I have lived most of my life spending my labor for that which does not satisfy. I won’t go into all of the details, and I don’t say any of this because I think anyone who doesn’t know it needs to know it. I’ll share a bit of my story here because I think it is a good illustration of that major issue in the life of my country.
I  have trained professionally for three careers in my life although I’ve only practiced two of them to any meaningful extent. My first intended career was in academics. I earned a PhD in Russian history at the University of Washington under the supervision of one of the top scholars in the field. I don’t know whether a career in academics, following in my father’s footsteps as a history professor, would have satisfied my psychologically or spiritually or not. When I got my PhD in 1977 there were no real jobs available for historians of imperial Russia. Well, there were two. I applied for both and got neither. Clearly I had to find other work.
So I went to law school. I practiced law from 1981 until 2003, with the last year of that time overlapping with my next career. I’ll spare you all the gory details. I’ll just say that at first I loved it. I remember walking through downtown Seattle as a newly minted baby lawyer and finding it all so exciting I could hardly believe I was there. I worked for three different downtown law firms. I made partner at none of them, I was getting nowhere with downtown law firms, but I thought that was their mistake not mine. I still thought of myself as a lawyer. Looking back on those times I can see that I should have realized that I needed to be doing something else, but that thought never occurred to me at the time. So in 1992 I opened my own law office in the Seattle suburb of Edmonds. I set about trying to build a practice as the Law Office of Thomas C. Sorenson.
At first it went OK, partly because I got work from a couple of those downtown law firms I had worked for. All that began to change in 1994. I began having great difficulty doing the law work I had to do, and I didn’t know why. A Presbyterian minister I had gotten to know when he served as the interim minister of the United Church of Christ church I attended had also been a Jungian analyst. He gave me a book that described a kind of inner work called active imagination. You sit with some way to write, clear your mind, and ask yourself questions about whatever it is that is bothering you. For some reason you’re supposed to write down your questions and the answers you get. I tried it. Sitting in my law office I asked myself why I was having so much trouble doing my legal work. Immediately, with no time having passed in which I could have thought about an answer, the answer came booming out of my subconscious: “You’re not a lawyer!” I was shocked. What was it deep within me that was telling me I wasn’t a lawyer? Of course I was a lawyer. I was a member of the Washington State Bar Association, WSBA No. 11977. I was sitting in an office that said Law Office of Thomas C. Sorenson on the door. I had legal work in my file cabinet. Not a lot of legal work, but some. That voice from deep within me kept telling me I wasn’t a lawyer.
So I asked: “What am I?” Again the answer came booming back so fast I couldn’t possibly have created it consciously: “You’re a preacher!” I was shocked. Preacher wasn’t even a word I used. I belonged to a church and I had actually preached there once; but I called the ordained person there a minister or a pastor but not a preacher. It should have dawned on me right there and then that I was spending my labor for that which did not satisfy, although I doubt that I had ever read Isaiah at that point in my life. It didn’t dawn on me at all. I gave up and went back to trying to do my legal work, all without any noticeable success.
By early 1997 I had become essentially nonfunctional. My daughter, then in high school but already very wise, diagnosed me as clinically depressed, a diagnosis that a psychiatrist I then saw confirmed. I took antidepressant drugs and kept trying to practice law with ever diminishing success. In February, 1997 I started seeing a Jungian analyst that that Presbyterian minister I mentioned had recommended to me back in 1994. For reasons I’ll never understand I still had that analyst’s card in my wallet. I still have sessions with him today more than twenty years later. He knew what my problem was well before I did, and over the next few months he helped me see that my time as a lawyer was at an end. No matter what the difficulties might be I had to find something else to do with my life. Even as I started to realize that truth I said over and over again “You’re too old and you can’t afford it.” My analyst helped me realize that while those things may have been true they just didn’t matter.
I see now that my subconscious had been right back in 1994. I had a law degree. I’d even graduated in the top ten percent of my class. I had more than twenty years of legal experience. I had been a good, competent lawyer though never a great one. I didn’t have any other work I could do. I turned fifty in 1996, and I wasn’t making any money. All of that was true, but there was a deeper truth that I had been avoiding and resisting for years. Lawyering was for me work that did not satisfy. It did not satisfy because it clashed with who I really am. The result of my insisting on lawyering was total burnout and moderately severe clinical depression. I kept fantasizing about getting on my motorcycle, driving east until I ran out of gas, then just sitting there until the end came. I had hit bottom both personally and as a lawyer.
I closed my law office at the end of July, 1997, and in September of that year I entered the Master of Divinity program at Seattle University. Not long after that I started the approval for ordination process in the United Church of Christ. I wasn’t sure why. I just knew I had to be there. My wife, sadly since deceased, asked me how I was going to pay for it. Private universities like Seattle U are very expensive. I said I didn’t know. I said I’d go into debt if I had to, and I did go into debt. I found halftime work as a lawyer in a legal services office in central Seattle defending low income tenants in eviction cases. That at last was law that at least on occasion satisfied because it was working with real people with real problems that sometimes I could actually help. In my time at Seattle U I discovered at long last who I really am. I stopped doing work that did not satisfy. In 2002 I began my third career, this time as a parish pastor in the United Church of Christ. I have grieved deeply the death of my first wife since then, but I haven’t been depressed. I even stopped taking antidepressant medication.
I’ll say again that I tell this story here not because I think anyone who doesn’t know it needs to know it but because I think it is a good example of one of the foundational dynamics of American life today. I burned out and became depressed because I insisted on doing work that my culture honored but that did not satisfy. My country suffers cultural clinical depression because so many of us live our lives spending our money for that which is not bread and our labor for that which does not satisfy. Here are some of the ways in which our dominant white American culture drives us to do it though we would be far healthier psychologically and spiritually if we didn’t.
For our entire lives advertising tells us that our only purpose for living is to buy products whether we need them or not so that other people can make money. We live in a consumer economy and a consumer culture in which personal value is measured more by net financial worth than by anything else. Our culture tells us from the moment we’re born that the highest good is to have the fattest bank account, the biggest house, and the most expensive car. Perhaps it is still more true for us men than it is for women, but we’re all told our whole lives that our goal in life is to “get ahead.” To get ahead means to rise up the hierarchy of whatever institution we work in be that institution commercial, professional, educational, military, or of any other sort. We feel pressure to “succeed” in whatever work we do even if that work is soul killing, as so much work in the modern economy is. Consume! Produce! Succeed! That’s the message we get from our culture from our first breath to our last. It is a message that kills the spirit and stunts the soul. It gets most of us doing work that simply does not satisfy.
As our culture asserts its materialistic values it deprecates spiritual values at the same time. Few of us attend church, synagogue, mosque, or other religious institution much any more except perhaps for weddings and funerals. Don’t waste your time in school studying literature, music art, history, or religion we’re told. Study science, not because you love science or because science can be a very good thing in its own right as we are all learning anew in this time of coronavirus pandemic but because it will help you get that job at which you will be so pressured to succeed. At university we’re told don’t major in history of English, major in business administration. Not because it will feed your soul (which it almost certainly will not) but because it is practical and will help you get a job of which your culture approves, namely one devoted to physical production and making money.
There are other ways in which we spend our money for that which is not bread and our labor for that which does not satisfy. We glamorize the military and encourage young men and women to make a career there all the while not quite mentioning the fact that the purpose of the military is to kill people and destroy property. We make idols of entertainment and sports stars while failing to recognize that they do nothing constructive in their careers except provide a little amusement, the circuses part of our bread and circuses. We make idols of the super-wealthy and allow millions of our fellow Americans to go hungry, homeless, and without decent educations or medical care. None of these things truly satisfy. They all contribute to our cultural clinical depression.
There’s another way that our culture kills spirits that Isaiah didn’t mention but that is immensely destructive among us. We tell our selves lies and convince ourselves that they are true. We say tax cuts for the wealthy help everyone. They don’t, and it’s obvious that they don’t. They help the wealthy who don’t need help and dry up government resources for people who do need help. We say the American military exists to defend our freedom. It doesn’t, not primarily anyway. It exists to assert American power around the world, which is hardly the same thing as defending our freedom. We say we are the greatest nation on earth. We aren’t. Many other nations (starting close to home with our neighbor to the north) do a far better job than we do of caring for their people while still preserving the civil liberties that we think are unique to us when they aren’t. All of this kills souls and keeps a spirit-quashing system in place and in power. There are so many ways in which we Americans spend our money for that which is not bread and our labor for that which does not satisfy.
It doesn’t have to be that way. Some of us, not nearly enough but some, have broken away from work that does not satisfy and found work that does. I did it when I left the law and became an ordained Christian minister. Others have done it by becoming teachers or artists, leaders of charitable foundations or social justice organizations. Yes, we all have to earn a living, but we don’t have to kill our souls working to earn more than we need the way so many of us do. We don’t have live the lie that mere material success produces a worthwhile life. Of course we all need a certain level of physical wellbeing, but we don’t have to deny the spiritual aspects of life to get it. We can remember that a full, complete life is full spiritually not just materially. We can remember or discover for the first time that God is real and wants fullness of life for everyone. We can overcome our selfish egos and work for the wellbeing of others. We can pray. We can learn to appreciate the finer things of life—music, art, literature, knowledge, faith. There are so many ways in which we can be so much better satisfied than most of us are.
So I ask you what I long asked myself and what the great prophet Second Isaiah asked all of us so many centuries ago: Why do we spend our money for that which is not bread and our labor for that which does not satisfy? There are no good answers to that question, only bad ones. Our nation wallows in ignorance, intolerance, hatred, and spiritual malaise. We do so because we keep spending our money for that which is not bread and our labor for that which does not satisfy. We don’t have to. Better lives can be had. All it takes is for us to wake up, to start buying bread not dust, to do work that truly satisfies the soul at the deepest levels. We don’t have to spend our money for that which is not bread and our labor for that which does not satisfy. So let’s all stop it, shall we?

Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Requiem For a Heavyweight


Requiem for a Heavyweight
On the Demise of the Seattle University School of Theology and Ministry

In September, 1997, I enrolled in the Master of Divinity program of the Institute of Ecumenical Theological Studies of the School of Theology and Ministry at Seattle University, Seattle, Washington (IETS of STM at SU). It was the beginning of the most transformative time of my life. I’d spent a lot of time in school before I got to SU. I already had a Ph.D. in history and J.D. What I didn’t know when I first entered STM at SU (we did use a lot of acronyms there) was just how transformative and how wonderful my time there would be. Seattle University is a Jesuit university, thoroughly Roman Catholic and more specifically Jesuit in its approach to education and to life. Just a couple of months before I enrolled the SU School of Theology and Ministry had created the Institute of Ecumenical Theological Studies. STM had offered a fully accredited Master of Divinity degree for some time by September, 1997. The School had worked with representatives of several Protestant denominations, including my United Church of Christ, to design a way for Protestant students to earn that fully accredited degree at Seattle University. The Institute of Ecumenical Theological Studies was the result. It officially opened on July 1, 1997. It was a radical, even revolutionary thing for Seattle University to do. A Jesuit university was going to be educating Protestant students and forming them for ministry in a range of Protestant denominations. It was unprecedented. As far as I know it still is.
My experience at STM wasn’t perfect. It was after all human, and nothing human is perfect. It was however beyond wonderful. When I started I wasn’t even entirely sure why I was there. I just knew I had to be. I remember seeing that the M.Div. degree required two years of field internship. I nearly decided not to go. I couldn’t possibly imagine actually arranging such a thing, but I did. The student body at STM was about half Catholic and half some sort of Protestant. Most of the professors were Catholic, with one major exception. Many of them were wonderful. Father Mike Raschko, Ph.D. was the one from whom I took the most classes, six of them as I recall. Father Raschko is brilliant. He did a wonderful job of combining deep theological thought with a pastoral emphasis. He has a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, and while he taught at STM he also served part-time as a Catholic parish priest. Father Jim Eblen was another great one. Like Father Raschko Father Eblen is a Catholic parish priest. He knows Hebrew scripture backwards and forwards, inside and out. I learned Christian sexuality from a priest and a nun who are a couple in every way except sexually. There were a couple of clunkers. A class called Group Dynamics was a total waste of time and money, and I did a lousy job of concealing my disdain for it.
Then there was MTI, a class called Ministerial and Theological Integration. It was the class that went together with the students’ first year of field work. I’m sorry to say I don’t remember the name of the woman who led my section of it, but the field work program at STM was designed and led by The Rev. Dr. Richard Cunningham. Dick is ordained in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), and he put together a field work program that surpasses by orders of magnitude any other I’ve heard of anywhere in the country. I’ve always called MTI the class where they cut you open, spread your guts all over the table, and put you back together as a pastor. The class that goes with the second year of field work was called Supervision. I took it from Dick Cunningham himself. I can’t tell you how many times he told me to get out of my head and show some heart. He was right. Years later, at a clergy retreat at the local UCC camp and convention center, I got talking with a woman who told me that earlier in her career she had directed the field work program at Yale. She described it to me. I hope I didn’t show it, but internally I was just shouting NO! What she described was nothing but head work. It didn’t sound like the program focused on how students actually function in ministry at all. Dick’s program at SU certainly didn’t have that problem. It was all practical. It was all integrating the student’s theological learning with practical ministry. It was mostly because of Dick’s program that the first day I walked into the church office as pastor of Monroe Congregational United Church of Christ I knew I was already a better minister than I had been ever a lawyer, my previous profession.
At STM I learned the power of listening. One of the required courses was called Pastoral Helping Skills. I remember it as a class on active listening. I learned in that class and even more so in my work as a parish pastor just how powerful actually listening to a person can be for that person. Perhaps the most important pastoral work a minister can do is to let her or his people know that the pastor will listen to them. Listen deeply. Listen not to formulate a response but simply to understand the person to whom you’re listening. My ability to do that was a gift of STM.
My fellow students were as important as the faculty in the transformation I underwent at STM. They came from a dozen or more Protestant denominations as well as the Roman Catholic Church. I learned from my interactions with them how everyone has a personal story that shapes who they are and what they are dealing with. I learned that the Catholic students didn’t know the Bible as well as the Protestant students did, but I also learned that it didn’t matter. They were wonderful people of faith both deeply committed to their Mother Church and struggling with some of its aspects. On a couple of occasions I sat with wonderful Catholic women who were in tears because they so strongly felt that the Holy Spirit was calling them to the full range of parish ministry, and their church would never let them do it. Among my classmates were Roman Catholic priests and nuns from around the world. One priest from The Philippines told a powerful story of standing up to Ferdinand Marco’s tanks along with his parishioners. My fellow students enriched my STM experience immensely.
Now, while STM is not shutting down entirely, it is drastically curtailing its offerings. The M.Div. program has been suspended. The school may do something to help current M.Div. students complete their degrees, or perhaps not. I frankly do not expect STM to survive for long under current circumstances. Seattle University as a whole faces an enormous budget deficit. Apparently enrollment at STM has declined to the point where tuition does not cover the school’s expenses. I understand that the Episcopal Church, the United Methodist Church, and the ELCA Lutherans have withdrawn their support of IETS. STM will not function again the way it did when I was a student there twenty and more years ago. I find that reality to be tremendously sad.
The demise of STM is part of a larger, nationwide decline in seminary education. Many seminaries have closed. In my UCC the seminaries in Maine, Connecticut, and Missouri are closed or nearly so. My UCC Conference Minister Rev. Mike Denton says that Chicago Theological Seminary is the most viable of the remaining seminaries because it has cooperative agreements with several other universities in the Chicago area and because it does a lot of its teaching online with students around the world. Not many seminaries will be able to set up anything like that to keep them afloat.
The drastic decline of the seminaries echoes the drastic decline of the mainline denominations generally. The churches we used to call mainline have been losing members and member churches for decades now. There is no reason to believe that that trend will change any time soon. In my UCC there are nowhere near as many fulltime ministry opportunities as there used to be. Newly minted Master of Divinity degree recipients must expect that any ministry position they find will not pay enough to support them and certainly not enough to support a family. I have thought for years that if anyone talked to me about going to seminary my first question to them would be “What else are you going to do to support yourself?” Most of us in one of the declining denominations find current developments in the church to be sad at best, but there doesn’t appear to be anything we can do about it.
So rest in peace STM. You enriched my life in more ways than I can recount. You prepared me for the last career of my life, the one in which my late wife said shortly before she died that I had become who I really am. I’m retired now, but the education I received at STM and the ministry STM prepared me for continue to enrich my life and I’m sure will continue to enrich my life for as long as that life may last. With the demise of STM we are losing an educational and ministerial heavyweight. Those of us who benefitted so much from her will never forget her. We pray for those whose lives are adversely affected by this loss—students, teachers, and staff. I don’t think they’ll find anything else like STM or like STM was. No such thing exists. Rest in peace STM. You were a bright light in my life and in the lives of so many others. We will never forget you.

Tuesday, July 7, 2020

It Doesn't Matter


It Doesn’t Matter
July 7, 2020
1 Samuel 15:1-3, 7-23

I have heard people say that they lost their belief in God and left the Christian faith because of one particular story in the Bible. It’s the story of God’s command to King Saul to kill every living thing among a people called the Amalekites. For no apparent reason the Amalekites had attacked the Hebrews during the Exodus at a place called Rephidim. The Hebrews fended off the attack. At some time that had to be at least a couple of centuries later Yahweh, the God of the Hebrews, has the prophet Samuel tell King Saul that Yahweh would punish the Amalekites “for what they did in opposing Israel when they came up out of Egypt.” 1 Samuel 15:2. Yahweh has Samuel tell Saul to attack the Amalekites “and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.” 1 Samuel 15:3. Saul attacks the Amalekites as directed. He defeats them, but he doesn’t quite do what Yahweh had told him to do. He takes Agag, the king of the Amalekites, alive. He also spares the best of the Amalekite livestock. 1 Samuel 15:8-9. Yahweh is not pleased that Saul hasn’t quite done everything Yahweh had told him to do. He says to Samuel: “I regret that I made Saul king, for he has turned back from following me, and has not carried out my commands.” Samuel tells Saul: “The Lord [Yahweh] has torn  the kingdom of Israel from you this very day, and has given it to a neighbor of yours, who is better than you.” 1 Samuel 15:28. Samuel then anoints David as king in Saul’s place.
I have indeed heard people say that they lost their faith in God and left the church because of this story. Why? Why would this story cause someone to lose their faith? It is of course a horrible story. In it God commands the complete destruction of the Amalekites because many, many years earlier their predecessors has attacked Israel in the wilderness. It would be bad enough if God had just ordered Saul to defeat the Amalekites militarily, but that’s not what God does in this story. God tells Saul to kill even the children and infants of the Amalekites. Saul apparently did kill every Amalekite person of any age, children and infants included, except the Amalekite king. He didn’t quite kill all the livestock either but kept the best of it, he says, to offer as a sacrifice to Yahweh. 1 Samuel 15:21. We would accuse Saul of the war crime of killing innocent noncombatants. Not so Yahweh. Not in this story. Yahweh is so mad at Saul that he deposes him as king of Israel. It is a truly horrid story indeed.
OK, but why would it cause anyone to lose their faith? It’s just an ancient story, isn’t it? Well, yes it is. The problem however is that the Christian church has told people for a very long time that it and every other story in the Bible is more than that. The church has told people that the Bible isn’t just another book. It has called the Bible “the Word of God,” never mind that the Bible says that Jesus, not the Bible, is the Word of God. The church has told people that if the Bible says it happened then in fact it did happen just the way Bible says it did. So people read the story of Saul and the Amalekites and accept the story as historically accurate. If the Bible says God told Saul to kill every living thing among the Amalekites, even children and infants, then God did tell Saul to do that horrible thing, and we must accept that God did that horrible thing. These people who read the story that way and lose their faith because of it are quite properly repulsed by it. They can’t believe in a God who would order such a crime against humanity. They can’t believe that there is any truth in a religion whose God would command anyone to commit such an atrocity. So they give up on God. They give up on Christianity. They lose their faith altogether.
I can’t believe in a God who would do such a thing either. I certainly wouldn’t be an ordained minister of a faith whose God would do such a thing. Yet I do believe in God, and I am ordained to the ministry of Jesus Christ in the United Church of Christ. How is that possible? It’s possible because I don’t believe that God ever has or ever would tell anyone to kill anyone else. The God I know, love, and seek to serve never told Saul to kill one single Amalekite much less all of them. The Bible says God did. God didn’t.
Many Christians would find it shocking, or even blasphemy, to hear an ordained Christian minister say such a thing. In order for me to say it I have to have developed an understanding of the Bible different from the common one that says that everything in the Bible is a product of divine inspiration and therefore is and must be factually true. I have such a different understanding of the Bible. I developed in my book Liberating the Bible.[1] I explain there that belief that God wrote the Bible or that everything in it was inspired by the Holy Spirit will not survive even a modest scrutiny of what is actually in the Bible. The book is full of contradictions and impossible things the couldn’t possibly have  happened. There is no way to tell which parts of it are divinely inspired if it isn’t all divinely inspired. I won’t go into all of that here. If you’re puzzled or curious please read my book.
Here I will just give you my suggestion of how we can read the Bible without losing our faith. On the last page of Volume One of the book, in what I think is the best paragraph I’ve ever written, I say:

Let me suggest that you think of the Bible as invitation. The Bible doesn’t dictate truth to us. Rather, its ancient authors say here are the experiences and understandings of some of your ancient forbears in the faith. Generation after generation of faithful Jewish and Christian people have found meaning, hope, comfort, and challenge in these pages. So come on it. Learn what we have to say. Do the difficult work of really understanding our ancient texts on their own terms. Then do your own discernment. We did ours, now you do yours. We hope that what you read here will light your path to God, but we cannot relieve you of your duty to discern God’s truth for you and your world. We don’t all say the same things. We didn’t all understand God the same way. We didn’t understand the universe and human nature the way you do. But come on in. Learn from us. There is great wisdom here. Learn from us, but don’t just parrot back what we had to say. We invite you not to rote responses and easy answers. We invite you to the hard but sacred work of study and discernment. May God we with you in that work. Amen.[2]

Do you see how liberating that way of understanding the Bible is? There is, after all, a reason why I titled that book Liberating the Bible. When we approach the Bible this way we take everything in it seriously, but we don’t accept anything in it uncritically. We Christians at least ask of everything in it: Does this sound like Jesus? Does this story speak of God’s love and grace? If so we accept it and work with it to discern what it has to say to us and our world. If not we treat it as an historical record of ancient thought that just doesn’t ring true today.
Does the story of Saul and the Amalekites speak to us of God’s love and grace? Certainly not. The God of this story is vengeful and violent. The God we know in and through Jesus Christ is loving not vengeful, peaceful not violent. So let us relegate this story to the annals of the ancient past where it belongs. Some ancient Israelite author or storyteller thought God had told Saul to kill every living thing among the Amalekites. Perhaps he was simply trying to give a divine reason for something that had actually happened, or maybe not. We know how this story has come down to us over the centuries. We know what it says. Someone well over two thousand years ago understood God to be like the God of this story. We don’t. Someone many centuries ago thought that God had ordered King Saul to kill every living thing among the Amalekites. It doesn’t matter. We can rest assured that our God of love and grace never did any such thing and never will. Thanks be to God!


[1] Sorenson, Thomas Calnan, Liberating the Bible, A Pastor’s Guided Tour for Seeking Christians, Revised Edition, Volume One, Approaching the Bible, Coffee Press, Briarwood, NY, 2018, Stop 11, pp. 193-211.
[2] Id. p. 211.

Sunday, July 5, 2020

On True Patriotism


On True Patriotism
July 5, 2020

I’m an American.[1] I’ve never been anything else. I was born in the United States. Although in my youth I spent four different academic years abroad, I’ve never left the United States without an intent to return. The United States of America has always been my home.[2] I will die here. My ashes will be buried here. I am a white American. My ethnic roots are Irish, Danish, French, and English. I am a Protestant American. The United Church of Christ or its Congregational predecessor is the only church to which I have ever belonged. I am a cisgender heterosexual male American. I am more of less able-bodied.  I haven’t served in the American military, but I would have had I not been classified medically unqualified to serve. I’ve been an American for nearly seventy-four years, that is, for my entire life. In all these ways I’m about as American as a person can be.
Yet for all that the last thing I wanted to do yesterday on the Fourth of July was celebrate my country. Yes, I know. One of our founding  documents says that all men are created equal. We are supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave, or at least we say that we are those things every time we sing our national anthem.  I know our founders—white men all and many of them slave owners—saw this country as the light on a hill, as a beacon for the whole world. I know that our greatest president said that we have government of the people, by the people, and for the people. I know that we became the arsenal of democracy and played a major role in the defeat of the fascist, expansionist powers in World War II.[3] I know that our Constitution guarantees us rights that so many other people in the world don’t have.
I know all of that, and today it all rings hollow. It all rings hollow because late in life I have become more aware than ever that this country has spoken great words and failed miserably in the task of living up to them. When the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, supposedly on July 4, 1776, said that all men are created equal they didn’t mean it. They meant that all white, landowning males are created equal. Not women. Not white indentured servants. Most of all not Black people many of whom these supposed pillars of democracy owned and treated as chattel property. I know that those white men stole every square foot of this nation from the indigenous peoples of the land. I know that they conducted a campaign of genocide against those people, then confined those who survived to reservations on land white people didn’t want. I know that the US government violated every treaty it ever signed with a Native nation. I know that white Americans worked to deprive Native people of their cultures by forcing their children to speak English and become Christian. I know that we then made Indian people into second-class citizens of the nation and mostly forgot about them and their plight.
I know that it took a brutal civil war to end race-based slavery in this country. I know that after that war, by law in the south and by practice in the north, we deprived Black Americans of their basic human rights—the right to vote, the right to a decent education, decent medical care, and gainful employment equal to that of whites. I know that we lynched them for the slightest perceived violation of the rules of segregation or for no reason other than that they were Black. I know that today we imprison Black people at a much higher rate than we imprison white people. I know that today the Republican Party is still trying to restrict Black Americans’ voting rights and that Black people still live disproportionately with poor schools and poor medical care. I know that Black Americans live under thoroughly racist social, economic, and legal structures that make true equality impossible. They bear the brunt of police brutality, a fact of which most of us white Americans are only now becoming aware.
I know that although some states extended suffrage to women earlier men in this country didn’t give women the right to vote nationwide until 1920. I know that this country refused to add an equal rights amendment to the Constitution to protect women’s rights. I know that today women do not get equal pay for equal work but get paid significantly less for the same work than men do. I know that in many parts of the country a woman’s right to control her own body is constantly under attack. I know that only very recently have LGBTQ+ Americans begun to have their constitutional rights recognized and protected by law.
I know that this country has been imperialistic from the beginning. We took all of the land we now say is ours from indigenous peoples. We fought imperialist wars of expansion with Mexico and Spain. The war with Spain expanded the American empire far beyond our North American borders, making it stretch from Puerto Rico to The Philippines.  I know that after World War II we assumed the role of policeman of the world and as a bulwark against Communism, convincing ourselves that the Communist threat was a lot greater than it actually was. I know that we fought an immoral and massively destructive war in Vietnam. After 9-11 we invaded Afghanistan. Our military is still there almost twenty years later. We committed the war crime of starting an illegal war of aggression in Iraq, thereby provoking Islamist extremists to keep attacking us and giving them a most useful propaganda and recruitment tool. I know that we spend an obscene proportion of our national wealth on the military and that our economy would collapse if we didn’t.
I know that the wealthy control our politics with their money. They put in office politicians, mostly but not exclusively Republicans, who enact laws, especially tax laws, to the benefit of the wealthy and the detriment of the rest of us. I know that the unequal distribution of wealth in this country has reached unconscionable  levels. A very small percentage of Americans own an outrageous percentage of the nation’s wealth. I know that we continue to insist that a corporation’s only real reason for existing is to return dividends to its shareholders, thereby allowing them to engage in destructive labor, environmental, and other practices.
I know that our constitutional system of electing a president combined with the ignorance and bigotry of a great many Americans has put into the White House a racist fascist. He separates immigrant children from their parents and keeps them in cages. He calls people demonstrating for justice a left-wing mob out to destroy the country. He advocates retaining monuments to Confederate men who betrayed the country and fought to preserve slavery. He calls white supremacists fine people. He gives dog whistles to his racist political base and refused to condemn white extremist violence. He pretends the coronavirus pandemic doesn’t exist or at least that will go away on its own. He has grossly failed to provide the leadership the country needs to cope with that pandemic.
I know that my country is simply insane when it comes to guns. Americans own guns in unfathomable numbers. They think owning a gun makes them safe when the research shows that households without guns are safer than households with them. They think that by owning an AR-17 they can defend themselves when the government comes after them as these paranoid types think it will. Never mind that the government could take them out without even trying hard it if wanted to no matter how many AR-17s someone has. The Supreme Court has read an individual right to own guns into the Second Amendment, thereby ignoring the plain wording of that Amendment. Our federal government will not enact the most basic, sensible gun control measures such as outlawing the possession of military style weapons and requiring background checks for all gun purchases.
I know that we have done a bang-up job of destroying the environment and putting life on earth at risk with our environmentally destructive policies. The current presidential administration has repealed many of the few modest environmental regulations we had so that the Republicans’ wealthy backers can make even more money at the public’s expense. We continue to burn massive amounts of carbon-based fuels thereby contributing massively to global warming. There are I suppose other unconscionable things you could add to this list of American outrages, but I trust the point is made. This country is far from deserving to be celebrated the way the myth of American greatness says it is.
So does it make any sense to be in any way patriotic today? I think it does, but we must redefine the word patriotic. We must not see patriotism as celebration. We must not see it as reaffirmation of the American myth that we are the greatest country in the world. We may be the strongest military power on earth. We may have the richest economy on earth. Those things do not make a country great. They only make it strong.
Rather than seeing patriotism as celebration we must come to see it as repentance. Repentance is of course a widely misunderstood concept. It doesn’t mean feeling sorry for something. It doesn’t mean beating yourself up over things you can’t change. To repent is to turn around. It is to reverse course. It is to work to make up for wrongs you have done in the past. I suppose it does include feeling sorry or even guilty for past wrongs, but a wrongdoer just sitting there beating up on himself or herself does no one any good. It isn’t true repentance. Repentance isn’t passive. To repent is to act to make what is wrong right and to cease doing whatever it was that you did that was wrong in the first place.
Which of course makes repentance a bit problematic in the case of the United States. There is so much in our past that we can’t undo. We can’t undo the fact that the land we occupy once belonged to other peoples. We can’t undo the fact that we stole it from them. There is no place else for those of us who are not of Native descent to go. The United States is well-established on its land. It’s not going to go away. We can’t undo the past. We can’t go back and redo our history in a more just way. We can’t undo the reality that racism is America’s original sin. We can’t undo our history of slavery and Jim Crow. We can’t undo the past de facto segregation in the north. We can’t un-fight the Mexican and Spanish wars. We can’t uninvaded Vietnam, Afghanistan, or Iraq. We can’t undo the historical truth that when our founders said that all men are created equal they didn’t mean it. There is so much we can’t undo.
What we can and must do is turn our future around. We can and must renounce and condemn racism and see that its deleterious effects end. We can and must reject policies that benefit only the wealthy, most of whom are white. We can and must make the tax structure more equitable by assuring that those who benefit most from our institutions pay a proper share of their cost. We can and must guarantee everyone’s voting rights rather than work to restrict them for people politicians in power think won’t vote for them. We can and we must hold police accountable when they do wrong as we support them when they do right. We can bring the quality of schools in poor places up to the quality of schools in rich places. We can stop imposing harsher sentences for crimes on Black people than we do on white people. We can dismantle the prison industrial complex. We can begin to protect Mother Earth by switching to renewable energy sources and stopping to burn so much carbon-based fuel. We can make corporations more environmentally responsible by changing the law of what they are supposed to do. We can stop putting environmentally damaging installations disproportionately in majority Black areas. We can better guarantee the constitutional rights of women and minorities rather the restrict them the way we do. We can guarantee that all people but especially women and people of color receive equal pay for equal work. We can pass meaningful gun control laws. We can create a universal single payer health care system so that everyone in this country has access to quality medical care. These things and so many other constructive actions aren’t easy, but we can and must do them starting now.
Working to create a better America is what patriotism must mean today, not buying into and celebrating the idolatrous myth that we are the greatest nation on earth. We aren’t. Even our neighbor Canada is a greater nation than we are in a many ways. So are a great many other nations around the world that do a better job of caring for all of their people and that spend a much smaller proportion of their national wealth on the military. Patriotism today must mean working to get our country to live up to what it has always said it is. We’ve got a long way to go. Let’s get to work.



[1] It would be good if we had some other adjective for people of the United States of America. There are after all a lot of people in the Americas other than those of us in the United States. Sadly we don’t. Somehow Unitedstatesian just doesn’t work.
[2] Yes, I know. United States is grammatically plural, but we use it as a singular when referring to the country as a whole.
[3] Although most Americans think we did, we didn’t play the major role in defeating Nazi Germany. The Soviet Union did, but I won’t go into that forgotten truth here.

Saturday, July 4, 2020

On Our Relationship to Reality


On Our Relationship to Reality
July 4, 2020

I was delighted today when I read the famous Karen Armstrong saying something that, with a couple of caveats, I have been asserting for years. Beginning on the first page of her book The Lost Art of Scripture, Karen Armstrong makes this profoundly (though not completely) true statement of what the human relationship to external reality actually is:

[N]eurologists tell us that in fact we have no direct contact with the world we inhabit. We have only perspectives that come to us through the intricate circuits of our nervous system, so that we all—scientists as well as mystics—know only representations of reality, not reality itself. We deal with the world as it appears to us, not as it intrinsically is, so some of our interpretations may be more accurate than others. This somewhat disturbing news means that the ‘objective truths’ on which re rely are inherently illusive. The world is there; its energy and form exist. But our apprehension of it is only a mental projection. The world is outside our bodies, but not outside our minds….We are surrounded by a reality that transcends—or ‘goes beyond’—our conceptual grasp.[1]

What Armstrong says here is profoundly true—mostly. Indeed all we have is our perception of reality not reality itself. We are created as centered selves whose brains create a world in which we live. To Armstrong’s statement I would add only a couple of correctives.
First, from what Armstrong says we can conclude that the neurologists have finally caught up with the philosophers. Empirical philosophy has insisted since the eighteenth century that all we humans have is our perception of reality. David Hume, 1711 – 1776, was a pioneer in this understanding. To some of us its truth seems obvious, yet I have had a hard time convincing people of that truth. Most people simply don’t want to, or can’t, deal with the reality that perception and how our minds work with perception is all we have. That a great many people reject the notion, however, doesn’t make it false. It just means that the contention that perception is all we have is so radically different from what most people believe that when they hear it they just reject it. It’s truth however is not the least bit affected by that rejection.
Second, I do not accept Armstrong’s contention that the “world is there” with the necessary implication that we can know absolutely that it is there, that it in fact exists apart from our perception of it. We all live with what in my book Liberating Christianity I call the objectivist assumption.[2] We act as though we actually knew that the world that we perceive has objective reality apart from our perception of it. We have to make that assumption. Living with that assumption facilitates our lives. Not making that assumption can be deadly. But that reality doesn’t make it more than an assumption. We can assert, I suppose, that there must be something out there that generates the perceptions we have of it. Yet we know that the human brain is quite capable of creating worlds that are radically different from the worlds most of us create on the basis of our perceptions. This truth is most apparent in cases of mental illness in which people live in a reality that is real to them but not to anyone else. There simply is no way to prove that what we perceive as objective reality actually has any objective reality at all.
I would therefore modify Armstrong’s wonderful statement in a couple of ways. I would point out that what she means is that the neurologists have finally caught up with the philosophers. I would modify here statement that “the world is there” to “we assume that the world is there.” I would make those modifications to Armstrong’s statement, but I hope that a great many people will read her words and take them to heart. Human thought and therefore human life depend on the world’s people coming to understand them and all of their profound implications.


[1] Armstrong, Karen, The Lost Art of Scripture, Rescuing the Sacred Texts, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2019, pp. 3-4.
[2] Sorenson, Thomas C., Liberating Christianity, Overcoming Obstacles to Faith in the New Millennium, Wipf and Stock Publishers, Eugene, Oregon, 2008. See in particular pages 200 to 203.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

Why Are We Doing It So Badly?


Why Are We Doing It So Badly?
July 1, 2020

The United States of America is doing by far the worst job of any supposedly advanced country in dealing with the current coronavirus pandemic. We’re doing it so badly that the European Union has recently banned travelers from the United States from entering its member countries. We represent only about four percent of the world’s population, but we account for more than twenty percent of the world’s confirmed coronavirus cases and around twenty-five percent of the world’s confirmed coronavirus deaths. Why are we doing so badly in our response to the coronavirus pandemic? I can think of four factors that play a role in producing these appalling results. They are the total failure of our political leadership, our mad dash to reopen the economy too soon, American’s extreme individualism, and Americans’ extreme anti-intellectualism. I’ll take a look at each of these factors here.
The first is the total abdication of leadership by the president. He won't even wear a mask. There is no coordinated national policy for dealing with this crisis. The president's dereliction of duty could hardly be worse. I don't know how many deaths we can lay directly at his feet, but even if it is only ten percent of the country’s coronavirus deaths the president would be responsible for over 12,500 deaths. No American president has been responsible for that many American deaths since the Vietnam War.
The president finds the coronavirus pandemic unpleasant, but not for the reasons the rest of us do. It bothers him mostly because it hurts his chance of reelection. We’re told that he believed that he would be reelected because the US economy was (supposedly) so strong. The pandemic has caused the economy to go into recession with tens of millions of people out of work. President Trump understands the devastating effect those figures will have on his chances of reelection. So how does he respond? By exercising true presidential leadership in the national response to the pandemic? Hardly. He responds first by lying about it, making up absurd claims that it would just go away on its own. More recently he has simply ignored it. He exercises no leadership all. Indeed he refuses to take the measures all of the experts say we all must take if we are going to stop or even slow down the spread of the coronavirus. He will not wear a mask in public. At one point he talked publicly about how he didn’t think it was right for him to wear a mask in the oval office. What? Does he think the virus won’t be transmitted there because the space is sacred or some such nonsense?
The easiest thing for any president to do when faced with what we’re facing is to demonstrate the public health measures all the experts say we all must adopt. He could so easily appear in public in a mask. Millions of Americans would start wearing one just because they saw the president wearing one. But no. He’s so vain, so concerned about this looks, that he won’t do it. Never mind that he apparently uses some kind of coloring makeup on his face all the time. We recently saw a picture of him getting off Marine One, his personal helicopter, after his disastrous campaign trip to Oklahoma with some of that makeup rubbed off on his shirt. But wear a mask? No way. If he did that we wouldn’t see the face about which he is so vain. It is hard to imagine a worse presidential response to the coronavirus pandemic that the one we’ve gotten from Donald Trump. His response to this public health crisis is a major reason why we are responding to it so badly.
Second, much of the American public and many state governors, essentially all of them Republicans, have pushed so hard for the country to reopen, for the states to end any public health measures they have put in place, that much of the country started to go back to normal far too early. The impression is unavoidable that Republican governors in places like Georgia, Florida, Texas, and Arizona value money more than human lives. It is more important to them that money start circulating again than that human lives be saved. I don’t mean to downplay the economic effects of the pandemic. They are severe. They may become catastrophic. But withdrawing directives for people to avoid contact with other people and to take other precautions like wearing masks and washing hands well and often only prolongs the problem. The way Republican governors have rushed to reopen their state’s economy has caused the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths to increase dramatically in their states. Given that Americans move about the country frequently and often means that the increase of cases in those states puts the rest of us at increased risk.
Of course people didn’t have to stop doing what is right just because some governor stopped telling them to. Yet it was perfectly predictable that a great many people, especially young people frustrated by the closing of schools and the lack of opportunity for public recreation, would immediately start to act irresponsibly as soon as their governor stopped telling them to do what is right. That’s exactly what happened. Republican governors carry a large part of the responsibility for our pathetic national response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Third, American culture is the most individualistic one the world has ever known. We believe that each one of us can do whatever we want and that we need to look out only for ourselves and maybe our immediate family. Not all of us believe that of course, but far too many Americans do for this to be a healthy society or for us to react to the pandemic in appropriate ways. Far too many Americans say "Ain't nobody gonna tell me I gotta stay home or wear some damned mask!" That attitude is more widespread in the US than is it in any other country.
When we combine a strong individualism with the constitutional guarantees of civil liberties that we enjoy we get some most unfortunate results. We take the truth that everyone is entitled to their own opinion to mean that every opinion anyone holds is equally valuable and defensible simply because someone holds it. Far too many Americans will say “I got my rights! I know what I think! I can act on what I think, and no one has any right to tell me that my opinion is wrong or that it is harmful to others. I make my own decisions. I’m just exercising my constitutional rights. So to hell with you telling me something different.”
We take the truth that everyone has the right to their opinion to mean that everyone is entitled to hold their own version of the facts of any situation. Our radical individualism tells us that each person’s version of the facts is equally valid and entitled to respect just because someone thinks those facts are true and has the right to think those facts are true. Many Americans think it is a fact that the news of a pandemic is, to use President Trump’s phrase, “fake news.” They think it’s some sort of liberal conspiracy being foisted on us to prevent Trump from being reelected. Because people have the right to believe such nonsense they will cling to their version of the facts and all evidence to the contrary be damned. Public health measures are hard enough to enforce in any situation. When a great many people deny the facts on which those measures are based controlling the public health hazard the measures are designed to abate becomes almost impossible in many places. Until more Americans get over the unwarranted conclusions they draw from our strong individualism we will have a harder time than most countries in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic.
Fourth, the dominant American culture has long had a strong element of anti-intellectualism in it. People say "Those pointy-headed intellectuals don't know more than I do! I don't have to listen to them. They can't tell me anything I don't know better than they do." As someone said about me once: “He’s got book learnin’, but he don’t know shit.” Does someone have fancy degrees and hold a position of responsibility in public health? It doesn’t matter. Many Americans will say “She’s just some intellectual who don’t know nothin’ about real life. She don’t know about my life. She don’t know more than I do. Her education and experience don’t mean nothin’. She can’t tell me what to do!” Of course I’m one of those pointy headed intellectuals on whom so many Americans love to heap scorn. I’ve got more postgraduate degrees than almost anyone, although not in public health. So I find Americans’ anti-intellectualism simply incomprehensible. Yet I cannot deny that it is real. It is, and it is contributing in destructive ways to our national response to the coronavirus pandemic. Again, not every American thinks this way, but far too many of us do.
Put these four things together and we get the world's worst national reaction to the coronavirus pandemic (although Brazil seems to be as bad or nearly so). This pandemic is laying bare all of the shortcomings both of our current political non-leadership and of our dominant white culture. We are getting the response we deserve, and it's hard to see how it could be worse. We bring our pathetic response to this public health crisis upon ourselves. How we overcome our cultural and political shortcomings and eventually defeat this nasty virus I am sorry to say escapes me. I just hope and pray that somehow, someday we will.