Tuesday, January 23, 2024

Letter to the Editor Jan. 23, 2024

 This is the text of a letter I just sent to the editor of my local newspaper:


It is beyond doubt at this time that Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee for president in this year's presidential election. He has made it perfectly clear that, with him as the Republican candidate, there is only one issue in that election: Do you believe in America's traditional political system, that we've had for well over two hundred years, or do you want to replace it with a dictatorship with Donald Trump as the dictator? It matters not if you are, in normal times, politically liberal or conservative. It matters not whether you are a secular humanist, or if you let your religious faith determine your vote. It matters not what you think about immigrants. It matters not what you think about abortion. It matters not what you think about any regular political issue. This is not a regular election. This election is a referendum on American democracy. If you want to keep it, you vote for President Biden even if you don't like him or his policies. At the very least you don't vote at all, or you vote for someone other than Biden as long as you don't vote for Trump. Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany not through a violent coup but under the constitutional political system of Germany at the time. We face the same disaster in the 2024 presidential election. If you support American democracy, you simply must oppose Donald Trump in every possible legal way.

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

On Overreading a Bible Story

 

On Overreading a Bible Story

I participate in a weekly gathering with a few colleagues via Zoom. I value that group of friends and the brief time we spend together, albeit only virtually. However, I’ve noticed something that my friends, or at least a couple of them, are inclined to do. They love to read things into a Bible story that aren’t in the story. In our most recent meeting, we consider the story in Mark of Jesus calling the first disciples. It’s at Mark 1:14-20. In it, Jesus appears on the shore of the Sea of Galilee. He calls his first four disciples, all of whom are fishermen. In the story all four of them immediately drop what they’re doing and follow Jesus. In our discussion, my friends read various things into this little story that the story doesn’t say. They said these disciples probably didn’t completely abandon their trade as fishermen but returned to it from time to time. There is a story or two in the gospels that suggest that might have happened, but the story in Mark doesn’t say that. They talked about how these disciples, especially Peter, who, according to a different story had a mother-in-law, having to balance a commitment to family with a commitment to Jesus. Many of us have to do that balancing, but the story in Mark doesn’t say anything about these disciples doing any such thing. So often in our discussions, I find myself saying, “But the story doesn’t say that.”

Yes. Of course. It’s possible to read all kinds of things into Bible stories that the stories don’t say. None of the Bible stories is a novella that can address all of the questions a story might raise for us. Bible stories, and especially Jesus’ parables, are short. They’re mostly terse. They give us what the storyteller thought was important in making the point he wanted the story to make. The Parable of the Good Samaritan is a good example. In that parable, a son of a father who appears to be quite wealthy takes his inheritance in advance and goes off to a far country. They story tells us that he squandered his money there, but it doesn’t give us any more detail about what he did to squander it. I’ve heard people say he spent his money on prostitutes. Well, perhaps some men in his situation would do that, but the story doesn’t say that this character in the parable did it. We can make up any story we want about what this son did while he was away, but no matter what we come up with, the story doesn’t say that. Frankly, making up details of a story that the Bible doesn’t give us about the story may be a fun mind game, but that’s all it is. I really don’t see much point in it. It is overreading the story.

So what are we to do with Bible stories? First of all, we work with what the story gives us not what the story doesn’t give us. We look for the issues the story raises for us not for issues the story doesn’t raise for us. The story of Jesus’ call of the first disciples raises at least two important issues for us. One is the question of decision making. In the story, the disciples decide immediately upon meeting Jesus to leave their current lives behind and follow Jesus. It seems a strange thing for them to do so precipitously to most of us; but in the story, that’s what they do. The story leads us to ask: How do we make decisions? What factors do we consider? How much time do we take to make certain kinds of decisions? Those are important questions for all of us, and it is legitimate to use this little story from Mark to raise them.

This story raises another important question as well. In it, the four men whom Jesus calls to follow him immediately follow him. The story suggests that that means they got up and walked away with him, something we can’t do, not physically at least. Yet the story raises this important question: What does it mean to follow Jesus? Over the course of the gospels we learn, more or less, what it meant to Jesus’ disciples; but their experience can’t be our experience, not literally at least. So what does it mean to follow Jesus in our context? That is a vital question for every Christian, and it is legitimate to use this story from Mark to raise it. Yet it is not legitimate for us to read our answer to the question back into the story. That’s overreading the story.

Working with what is actually in a Bible story is often challenging enough. It doesn’t help us understand the story to read things into it that aren’t there. Bible stories often, perhaps mostly, raise questions for us rather than answer them. It is perfectly appropriate, needful even, for us to consider the questions a Bible story raises in and for our own context. That, however, is a very different thing from reading things into the story that aren’t in the story. We don’t know what the Prodigal Son did with his money. We don’t know why the beaten man in the Parable of the Good Samaritan was going to Jericho. Every Bible story raises questions about what isn’t in the story. Our call is to spend our time working with what is in the story. This contention of mine has led one of my colleagues to say I’m a literalist. I am nothing of the sort. I just want to use the text as the text actually is not as how we might wish it were. So let’s not overread Bible stories. They are plenty important and often plenty puzzling in their own right without us adding things to them that aren’t there.

Friday, January 5, 2024

Trump Cut from Balm in Gilead

 I had written these paragraphs as part of the draft of a book I'm working on with the working title Balm in Gilead. I decided they don't belong there, so I'm posting them here. They make several important points.


Trump Cut from Balm in Gilead

 

We see American nationalism, and to some extent Christian nationalism, in Donald Trump. He once publicly referred to certain countries other than the United States as “shithole” countries. He carries on about “America first!” He wants to shut off all, or nearly all, immigration into this country. He wants to deport millions of people who are already here. He wants to pull the United States out of certain international treaties He pulled us out of one treaty on the environment while he was president. He is an anti-Semite and racist who considers only us white Americans truly to be Americans or at least to be the good Americans. In all of these ways Trump has crossed from a healthy or at least harmless patriotism to a fascistic nationalism.

And he’s taking millions of conventional American Christians with him across that line. A great many American adherents of Conventional Christianity are MAGA Republicans who will overlook all of Donald Trump’s personal and political shortcomings in their effort to make him president again. He, of course, panders to them. He gives them “dog whistles” that don’t come right out and say things like use violence against my opponents but that many of his followers hear as calls to do just that. Donald Trump is no kind of Christian. He will use Christianity to enlarge his political base, but he has no actual faith in anything or anyone but himself. Yet so many adherents of Conventional Christianity are diehard Trumpists.

Why? How can that be? It can be in large part because of the way adherents of Conventional Christianity make banning abortion the main, and sometimes it seems the only, goal of Christianity. As I noted briefly above, conventional Christians have been on a crusade against legalized abortion for decades. Donald Trump and other Republicans promised them again and again that they would appoint federal judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case that said that the right to an abortion is not just legal but is constitutional. Donald Trump finally fulfilled that promise while he was president. The Conventional Christian opposition to all abortion is based on the absurdity that an embryo is a human being. Conservative Christians have followed politicians for years who have echoed that ridiculous assertion. Those politicians led a great many Christians to the far right of American politics. In the 2016 presidential election, which Trump won despite losing the popular vote, Trump got a great many Christians to overlook his obvious failings and shortcomings because he promised them he would get Roe overturned. Trump, it seems, has no strong personal opinion on abortion. He is, however, more than ready to use that issue to drum up support for his neofascism.

There is another powerful, though finally indefensible, reason why so many conservative American Christians follow Trump. It is the issue of the way the demographics of the United States are changing. Most American adherents of Conventional Christianity, though not all of them by any means, are white Americans of European descent. A majority of Americans have been white Americans at least since European immigrants displaced Native peoples as the primary demographic group in the country. White Americans pretty much ran the whole show. And not just white Americans but white American men made essentially all of the country’s decisions from the beginning until quite recently.

There have always been people of color in the United States and its predecessor political entities. Those first nation people have always been here and still are. There have always been Black Americans of African descent. For most of our history there have been Asian people in the country. And, of course, white Americans, hard as they tried, never quite succeeded in killing off all American Indians.[1] Especially, but not exclusively, in the what became the American southwest there have been people of Hispanic or mixed Hispanic/Native descent.

Nonetheless, white men were by far the dominant demographic in this country’s power structures from the beginning of European settlement. For example, I find photographs of Congress after Reconstruction and before the mid-1960s shocking because everyone in them is a white man. White men ran the government. White men ran the economy (though they did it relying on the labor of a great many people of color). White men ran most of the churches that had any political significance. White men ran the military. White men ran most of the country’s educational establishments, HBCU institutions being an exception here. There was always a bottom demographic level of people of color without which the country could not have functioned, but white men held essentially all of the power.

That demographic is changing. A time is now in sight when white Americans will still be a plurality of the population but will no longer be a majority. People of color have, to some extent, come into positions of power and authority in the country. We’ve had a Black president, not that having him made as much difference as many of us hoped it would. The Latinx population of the country has grown to the point that Spanish is practically a second language for us the way French is a second language of Canada. It is no longer as rare as it used to be to see people of color occupying positions of responsibility and authority in the country’s economic, political, and educational institutions at every level. Women too have come into positions of responsibility and authority. As I write, our Vice President is a woman. There simply is no question but that the demographics of this country are changing radically and rapidly.

A great many white Americans experience those changing demographics as a threat to them. We white American males are losing some of the privilege we used to have in our country. Or perhaps more accurately, women and all people of color are living with more privilege than they ever have before. Donald Trump plays to the insecurity and angst these changes produce among a great many white Americans. He blames people of color, especially recent immigrants, for what he says are this country’s problems. He says we must expel all immigrants or at least all undocumented immigrants. He says there are fine people among white supremacists. In the 1920s and 1930s, Adolf Hitler played on the insecurity and angst of a great many Germans by telling them that the Jews were responsible for all of their problems. Trump is using immigrants in exactly the same way, and his claims about immigrants are as much a big lie as were Hitler’s claims about the Jews. Tragically, a great many American Conventional Christians buy into this American fascism that Trump propounds.

Trump’s racism, and his misogyny too, are radically anti-Christian; but a strange thing is happening in this country. People, most of them probably adherents of Conventional Christianity, are melding an unhealthy nationalism and white supremacism with their faith and producing something called Christian nationalism. Trump plays to the country’s Christian nationalists nearly every time he opens his mouth in public. He panders to their anti-Semitism and their Islamophobia. He panders to their sexism. He blames immigrants, or at least immigrants of color, for economic problems that either don’t exist or that are in no way caused by immigrants. Christianity ought to keep people out of Trumpism, but instead many American Christians distort Christianity so badly that they have no problem combining their faith with politics produced not by faith but by fear.

All through 2023 the polls said Trump will almost certainly win the Republican nomination for president next year. The fact that he has been indicted for something like 91 different felonies has not significantly reduced his support among people who self-identify as Republicans. Whether a conviction before the 2024 election will reduce his support remains to be seen at the time of this writing. One thing that, ironically, might reduce his support is the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. That overturning won’t reduce Trump’s base. Trumpists love it. It may, however, reduce Trump’s support because it was fanatical opposition to abortion that got many people to vote for Trump in the first place. Now these people don’t need a president to do anything to overturn Roe. It’s already been overturned. So will Christians start to wake up to Trump’s personal immorality and fascistic nature of his policies? That, sadly, remains to be seen.

 



[1] I was never taught anything like this truth in public school, but Adolf Hitler believed that America could not object to what he was going to do to the Jews because of what white Americans had done to First Nation peoples in their country.


Monday, January 1, 2024

1/1/2024 Journal Entry

 

This is the journal entry I wrote for the beginning of a new year.

January 1, 2024

It’s New Year’s Day. People get all excited when a new year begins. I don’t. I don’t for two reasons. One is that all that happens on New Year’s Day is that a number changes on a totally arbitrary calendar. The other is that there is no reason to believe that 2024 will be any better than 2023 was, and 2023 sucked. 2024 begins with wars in Gaza, where Israel is essentially committing genocide, Ukraine, and no doubt elsewhere. Neither of those wars is likely to end any time soon. The big danger 2024 brings is that this fascist-leaning country will elect fascist Donald Trump president and give him a majority in both houses of Congress. If that happens, the United States is finished as a functioning democracy, and the harm the Republicans will do will take decades at least to undo. 2024 may not be bad for me and Jane personally. Jane may retire when she turns 65 in October. We’ll miss her income, modest as it is, but we’ll be OK financially, mostly thanks to Social Security, which the Republicans want to destroy. I’ll turn 78, but as far as I know, I have not life-threatening conditions at the moment. Yes, lots of medical issues, but they’re all under control for now at least. Matt turns 50 tomorrow, which is a bit hard to get my head around. I vaguely remember turning 50 myself, though that was in 1996, a very bad year for me. I actually remember turning 40 better. That was in 1986. I was working for Gibson, Dunn, and Crutcher. I don’t think turning 40 meant much to me, but then I see now that 40 is actually quite young. 78 isn’t. But when Dad turned 78 he still have 14 years to live. When Mom turned 78, she still had seven years to live. So, with any luck, I’ve still got a few to go. The end is a hell of a lot closer than it has ever been, but then I’m younger today than I’ll ever be again. So, we’ll see what 2024 brings. I don’t know that it will bring anything good. I just hope it doesn’t bring anything too bad.