On
Paul’s Gnosticism
February
7, 2022
In the first
century CE, when Paul was spreading the good news of Jesus Christ around the
eastern Mediterranean world, there was a philosophy that sometimes competed
with and even affected the development of the Christian faith. It was called
Gnosticism. The word Gnosticism comes from the Greek word gnosis, which
means knowledge. Gnosticism was an anthropology of sorts, an understanding of the
existential nature of us human beings. Perhaps you have heard humans described
as inspirited bodies. In this way of thinking the human body isn’t bad, it is a
temple of the divine. Gnosticism turned that understanding of the human upside
down. The Gnostics taught that in our true essence we are spirit. The human
existential dilemma isn’t sin, it is that we don’t know that what we really are
is not flesh but spirit. For the Gnostics our good, even divine spirit, is
trapped. It is imprisoned in a body of evil flesh. Knowing that we are really
spirit is the basic gnosis, the knowledge the Gnostics thought we needed
to know but didn’t.
The Christian
tradition considers Gnosticism to be a heresy. The theology that Paul expresses
in his authentic letters is of course considered to be orthodox not heresy.
Paul does however at times skate awfully close to the line between orthodox
Christianity and the heresy of Gnosticism. Here’s an example of him doing that
from his letter to the Galatians. We’ll see what he has to say here about both
human flesh and the Spirit.
Live by the Spirit I say, and do not gratify the desires of
the flesh. For what the flesh desires is opposed to the Spirit, and what the
Spirit desires is opposed to the flesh….Now the works of the flesh are obvious:
fornication, impurity, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions, envy,
drunkenness, carousing, and things like these. I am warning you….Those who do
such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. Galatians 5:16-21 with omissions.
Here's what he says about Spirit
as he continues, with a jab back at flesh at the end.
By contrast, the
fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity,
faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against such
things. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its
passions and desires. Galatians 5:22-24.
Pretty clear, isn’t it? When Paul
gives us vices and virtues lists like this one (there are others in his
writings) that for him human flesh is bad and the Spirit of God into which Paul
calls us to live is good.
If that attitude
toward human bodiliness, toward our physicality, sounds like something you’ve
been taught in church, there’s a good reason that it does. See, Gnosticism lost
the battle with orthodoxy over the nature of the body, but in the long run orthodox
Christianity absorbed so much of Gnosticism that it often sounds like
Gnosticism won the war. The Christian tradition came to have quite a negative
attitude toward human physicality. It has taught in particular that our sexual
desires, especially those of women, must be suppressed as something bad or even
downright evil. Why else would the Roman Catholic tradition, which was the
tradition of us Protestants too before the sixteenth century CE, insist that
Jesus’ mother Mary is “ever virgin?” Why else would the Roman Catholic Church
teach to this day that sexual relations are permissible only between a woman
and a man who are married to each other and even then only if the sex act
carries with it the possibility of the woman becoming pregnant? Protestant
churches too have preached a narrow sexual morality that sure seems to be
grounded in the belief that sex in and of itself is somehow bad, sinful even.
Well, a lot of us
Christians, and even a lot of us ordained Christian clergy like me, do not
believe that sex in and of itself is bad or necessarily sinful, though of
course we humans are quite able to turn it into something bad, and we do it all
the time. No, many of us today take a different view of the body from Paul’s,
and it’s just as biblical. Consider these familiar lines:
Then God said, ‘Let us make humankind in our image according
to our likeness’….
So God created humankind in his image,
in the image of God
he created them,
male and female the created them….
God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very
good. Genesis 1:26a, 27, and 31a.
What did God make that was indeed
very good? All of creation, and Genesis specifically includes God’s creation of
humans as female and male, that is, as sexual beings, as very good. I assume
that Paul knew the creation story with which the Hebrew Bible opens. It opened
with that story in his time too. Unfortunately, he chose to emphasize the
Bible’s second creation story, the one about Adam and Eve, over the Bible’s
first creation story, and he blamed Adam for bringing sin into the world. See
Romans 5:12. Paul preferred the very ancient and quite primitive story of Adam
and Eve to the beautiful and less ancient (though still very old) story of God
creating all that is, including the sabbath, in seven days simply by speaking all
that is into existence. That doesn’t mean, however, that we have to do the
same. Genesis 1:27 recognizes that God made us humans as physical, sexual
beings. And indeed it was very good.
Now, don’t get me
wrong. Human sexuality is God’s good gift to us, but in order to keep it from
becoming sinful, that is, to keep us from corrupting that gift, we must
exercise our sexuality very carefully. I need not list all the dangers
associated with sex. We all know what they are. Still, sex is part of our good
creation in the image and likeness of God. We must make sure we practice it
only as God’s good gift.
So Paul, I know
that you were Christ’s apostle to us Gentiles. I know that you developed the
theology of justification by grace through faith that is the basis of our
Protestant Christianity. For those things I give thanks to you and to God. But
your take on human physicality is just too gnostic for me and for many people
today. We are not good spirit trapped in evil flesh. Both our spirits and our
bodies are part of God’s good creation. Let’s treat both of them as the good
gifts that they are. May it be so.
No comments:
Post a Comment