God
as She
January
30, 2022
Today the Rev.
Patty Ebner, a pastor of the First Congregational Church, United Church of
Christ, of Bellevue, Washington, gave a wonderful sermon on the importance of
our using female language for God. She reminded me that in the summer of 1998 I
took a Christology course from the great Roman Catholic feminist theologian
(yes, there really are such people) Elizabeth A. Johnson, who was a visiting scholar
that summer at Seattle University, where I was in seminary. She goes by Beth
not Elizabeth, and ten years later she wrote a very flattering endorsement of
my first book, Liberating Christianity. One of Beth’s major themes is
that what became incarnate in Jesus of Nazareth was the feminine manifestation
of God Sophia who appears in Proverbs in in books that are Apocryphal in the
Protestant tradition but canonical in the Catholic tradition like Sirach and
The Wisdom of Solomon. By New Testament times a sexist culture had changed the
feminine noun Sophia into the masculine noun Logos, the Word, although the
early Roman Christians did name the great cathedral church in Constantinople Hagia
Sophia, Holy Wisdom. In her great book She Who Is (if you haven’t read
it, please do), Beth says repeatedly that “the image of God functions.” She
means, quite correctly, that the way we think of God influences every aspect of
our lives. She also says that the image of God as feminine works as well, and
as poorly, as the image of God as masculine. She taught me that changing our
words for God from masculine to an impersonal neuter is better than nothing,
but it’s not enough. Calling God Creator is better than calling God Father, but
if we are ever to get beyond our faith tradition’s androcentrism and even
misogyny we must start calling God she and Mother.
It is undeniable
that the Judeo-Christian tradition has given us a male God. Oh sure. We all say
we know that God isn’t male, but look at the language we use. We call God
Father not Mother. We call the second person of the Trinity the Son. We worship
a male human being who we say is God Incarnate, not a female one. Our tradition
calls him Lord, definitely a male term. We begin the prayer we say he taught
us, “Our Father” not “Our Mother.” In my particular tradition we sometimes
change that second word to Creator, but we rarely if ever change it to Mother.
How did we get here, and what are we going to do about it?
The simple answer
to how we got here is that our Christian faith has roots in and grew out of
ancient Judaism. Scholars tell us that the stories in the Hebrew Bible (our Old
Testament) go back at least to 1200 BCE and probably much farther back than
that. Ancient Judaism differed from the other religions of the ancient world,
though not in the way most people think it did. Except for Judaism, all of the
religions of the ancient world were polytheistic. They worshipped multiple
gods. Many if not all of them also worshipped goddesses. The religion of the
people the Bible tells us occupied what would become Israel, the Canaanites, had
as their main god the very masculine god Baal, but Baal wasn’t the only deity
in that tradition. Baal had a divine female consort named Ashera. Around the
time of Jesus a cult developed in the Mediterranean world around the Egyptian
goddess Isis. You may well have heard of ancient Greek goddesses like Athena. The
ancient world was full of female images of the divine.
Israel wasn’t.
Hebrew faith differed from other ancient faiths, but not for a long time
because it was monotheistic. Until the mid-6th century BCE it wasn’t
monotheistic. It was what we call henotheistic. Israel’s henotheism did not
deny the reality of other people’s gods and goddesses the way monotheism does. It
said only that the Hebrew people were to worship only one god. That god’s name
was YHVH. Hebrew was spelled without vowels, which is why there are none in
that name. The name is usually transliterated into English as Yahweh (w not v
because we use the German transliteration. Don’t ask me why) though some still
transliterate it as Jehovah. The Old Testament of ten refers to Yahweh as “your”
or “our” God. Yahweh was at first and for a long time the people’s war god, and
he was definitely male. For an ancient Bible verse that sees Yahweh as a war
god see Exodus 15:20-21, where the prophetess Miriam leads the women of the
tribe that has just escaped from Egypt in singing praises to Yahweh, who, she
says, has just defeated the Egyptian army for them. (Your English translation
may say Lord here not Yahweh, with
Lord typed in what are called
small caps. In the Old Testament, when you see the word Lord printed that way you know that the Hebrew word being
rendered into English is YHVH. And by the way, Lord
typed that way in the Old Testament never means Jesus.) Ancient Israel had no
god but Yahweh, and Yahweh was aggressively male. War gods usually are. In the
mid-sixth century BCE, during the Babylonian exile, an Israeli prophet
developed true monotheism for the first time in human history. For an example
of a biblical text that expresses that monotheism see Isaiah 45:1-7. The “Cyrus”
the text refers to is Cyrus the Great, King of Persia. Yet that one and only
God was still Yahweh, and in the Jewish tradition Yahweh never ceased to be
male. The Israelites referred to Yahweh using only masculine language. They
always called God he. They certainly never called God she.
The earliest
Christians may not have called God Yahweh, but they inherited the Jewish
conception of God as male nonetheless. Search the New Testament for a reference
to God as female. You won’t find it. It isn’t there. Many of the earliest
Christians believed that God, expressed as the masculine noun Word, became
incarnate in the male human being Jesus of Nazareth. The earliest New Testament
documents are the authentic letters of Paul. Paul called God Father never
Mother. All of the New Testament documents were writen in and for a
Greek-speaking culture that was patriarchal and androcentric if not downright
misogynist. None of the New Testament authors saw any reason not to call God
he. That, after all, is what their mother faith of Judaism called God. Also,
when the New Testament refers to scripture it means the Septuagint, a Greek
translation of the Hebrew Bible that retained the Hebrew Bible’s exclusively masculine
language for God. Except for a few lonely voices like Beth Johnson that cry out
for us to use female images for God, Christian language for God has been almost
exclusively male ever since.
So. Is God male?
Of course not. God transcends all human characteristics including gender. Most
Christians today will acknowledge the truth of that statement. Yet we relate to
God using terms that come from our lived human experience as human beings that
are almost exclusively male. But if God transcends us absolutely, and God does,
and we relate to God using human terms, why can’t we use feminine terms to
refer to God? The answers is, there is no reason whatsoever that we can’t. We
can. As Beth Johnson says, female terms for God work as well, and as poorly, as
male ones do.
Some Christians
today get it. The feminist theologians both Protestant and Catholic do. My
favorite modern hymn does too. The second verse of the hymn “Bring Many Names”
by Brian Wren goes”
Strong mother God,
working night and day,
planning all the
wonders of creation,
setting each
equation, genius at play.
Hail and Hosanna!
Strong mother God!
Not only does Wren call God
mother, he turns our usual gender stereotypes upside down. His next verse is
about “warm father God, hugging every child,” for which we should all give him
our most sincere thanks.
So what are we
doing to do about it? Let me suggest something as a way to begin. Try thinking
of God as Mother not Father. Start the Lord’s Prayer “Our Mother,” not “Our
Father.” Try thinking of God as Mother of all creation. Call God she not he. I’ll
tell you that when I do that I feel very differently about God. Yes, it’s hard
to get beyond our gender stereotypes the way Brian Wren does, but what images
does thinking of God as feminine bring to mind? Certainly not vengeful anger,
judgment, and eternal damnation, things our tradition has so frequently (and so
wrongly) attributed to God. When I call God Mother or she I think first of all
of maternal love. I know that not all people are lucky enough to have human
mothers like this, but when I think of God as Mother I think first of all of
maternal love. Unconditional love that never gives up on anyone and is always
more than happy to welcome her children home. I think of a hospitable God
always happy to have us drop in for a visit. I think of birth, of all creation
being born from God. I do get a very different sense of God indeed than I get
when I think of God as male. I know that thinking of God as feminine isn’t easy
for most of us. We’ve all been thoroughly conditioned by our tradition to think
of God as male even when we say we know that God isn’t male. But give it a try.
You may find that doing so opens up a whole new and wonderful way of relating
to God for you. May it be so.
No comments:
Post a Comment