Yes
and No
August
27, 2020
The Scripture quotations contained herein are from the New
Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian
Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. Used
by permission. All rights reserved.
I have a
confession to make. I’ve never been much into the Psalms. I wrote about them in
Liberating the Bible, but I discuss there only a few of them and don’t
say all that much.[1]
I’ve always loved Psalm 139, or at least most of it. More about that anon. I
carried a copy of most of it in the front of my class notebook all the way
through seminary. I suppose I memorized Psalm 23 in Sunday School like so many
of us did. Still, I never paid a whole lot of attention to the Psalms, that is
I haven’t until recently. As I have been idled by the coronavirus pandemic as
so many people have I have started to use the daily lectionary from the
Presbyterian Book of Common Worship Daily Prayer.[2]
In that lectionary there are four Psalms or passages from Psalms for each day,
two for use in the morning and two for use in the evening. I’ve been reading
all of them. I’ve written up ideas that have come to me from some of them.
Those writings are on this blog. As I have been spending more time with the
Psalms than I ever have before something about the Psalms that I actually did
know before has struck me anew. The Psalms contain magnificent, moving,
inspiring, and compelling expressions of faith. To those passages I say an
enthusiastic yes. But the Psalms also contain passages to which I can only say
simply no. I want to wrestle with that truth in this piece. Here are some
examples.
I was reminded of
this truth recently as I read Psalm 143 from the daily lectionary I’ve been
using. It starts out nicely:
Hear my prayer, O Lord;
give ear to my
supplications in
your
faithfulness;
answer me in
your
righteousness.
Do not enter into judgment with
your
servant,
for no one is
righteous
before
you. Psalm 143:1-2.
Then, however, it does what so many
Psalms do. It starts going on about the psalmist’s “enemy:”
For the enemy has pursued
me,
crushing my life
to the ground,
making me sit in
darkness like
those
long dead. Psalm 143:5.
This Psalm has some other very
nice lines in it:
I stretch out my hands to you;
my soul thirsts
for you like a
parched
land. Psalm 143:6.
And:
Let me hear of
your steadfast
love in the morning,
for in you I put my trust.
Teach me to do
your will,
for you are my God.
Let your good
spirit lead me
on a level path. Psalm 143:10.
Very nice indeed. But then we come
to verse 12:
In your steadfast
love cut off my
enemies,
and destroy all of my adversaries,
for I am your servant. Psalm 143:12.
That’s how the Psalm ends, with a
plea to God to destroy some of God’s people whom the psalmist considers his
enemies. That’s something I find very troubling indeed.
Then there’s my
favorite Psalm that I mentioned above, Psalm 139. What I loved about this Psalm
when I was in seminary was mostly how it begins:
O Lord, you have searched me
and known me.
You know when I
sit down and
when I rise up;
you discern my thoughts from
far away.
You search out my
path and my
lying down,
and are acquainted with all
my ways. Psalm 139:1-3.
Psalm 139 is also about how God is
with us no matter what, and I love that part of the Psalm too. Even if we try
to get away from God, God is still with us:
Where can I go
from your spirit?
Or where can I flee from your
presence?
If I ascend to
heaven, you are
there;
if I make my bed in Sheol, you
are there.
If I take the
wings of the
morning,
and settle at the furthest limits
of the sea,
even there your
hand shall
lead me,
and your right hand shall hold
me fast. Psalm 139:7-10.
Verse 18b reads:
I come to the end—I
am still
with you.
I love this Psalm because I know
that earlier in my life God knew me far better than I knew myself. I also love
it because I know that I need reassurance that God is always with me no matter
what. These are for me among the most reassuring verses in the Bible. I loved
them when I was in seminary. I love them still.
But them we come
to verses 19 to 22. They read:
O that you would
kill the wicked,
O God,
and that the bloodthirsty would
depart from me—
those who speak
of you
maliciously,
and lift themselves up against
you for evil.
Do I not hate
those who hate
you, O Lord?
And do I not loathe those who
rise up against you?
I hate them with
perfect hatred;
I count them my enemies.
After this paean to hatred and
death Psalm 139 ends on a much better note:
Search me, O God,
and know my
heart,
test me and know my thoughts.
See if there is
any wicked way
in me,
and lead me in the way
everlasting. Psalm 139:23-24.
So in Psalm 139 we get some of the
most beautiful and reassuring verses in the Bible, and we get some of the verses
I and many people most dislike and cannot accept.
In Psalm 137 gets
worse than those unfortunate lines of Psalm 139. That Psalm begins as a moving
cry of despair by the Jews who have been hauled off to exile in Babylon after
the fall of Jerusalem:
By the rivers of
Babylon—
there we sat down and there
we wept
when we remembered Zion. Psalm 137:1.
The psalmist cries:
How could we sing
the Lord’s
song
in a foreign land? Psalm 137:4.
He vows never to forget Jerusalem.
Psalm 137:5-6. Up to this point we sympathize with the grief and despair of the
Hebrew exiles.
But then the
Psalm changes its tune altogether:
O daughter
Babylon, you
devastator!
Happy shall they be who pay
you back
what you have done to us!
Happy shall they
be who take
your little ones
and dash them against the rock! Psalm
137:8-9.
Really? It would be a good thing
if someone would kill Babylonian children by dashing them against a rock? I
sure don’t think so. Even if we exulted in the destruction of Babylon like the
prophet Nahum exulted in the destruction of Nineveh, which I would not, how can
there be anything good about killing children by dashing them against a rock?
There can’t, but Psalm 137 sure seems to think there would be. That’s how
brutal, how primitive, the Psalms can become.
What are to make
of this schizophrenic nature of so many of the Psalms? How can people of faith
write verse of deep and insightful faith on the one hand, then turn and extol
hatred and infanticide on the other? As king Mongkut of Siam says in “The King
and I,” “’Tis a puzzlement.” Here’s the best I can do to resolve that
puzzlement.
Like is true of everything
in the Bible the Psalms are human creations. They come from a world far
different from ours. Of course our world can be horribly violent. The world of
the ancient Psalms was no less violent. Everyone just expected that rulers
would engage in violence. They would kill their opponents. They would go to
war. I don’t mean to suggest that more recent rulers were different in that
regard, but that kind of violence was endemic in the ancient world. True,
ancient war wasn’t nearly as destructive as modern war. The ancients didn’t
have the immensely creative, expensive, and destructive weapons that we have.
Still, war was endemic in the ancient world. Ancient history isn’t only a
history of wars by any means, but any study of the ancient past must deal with
an awful lot of them.
Human life can be
treated as awfully cheap in our world, but it was if anything even cheaper in
the ancient world. Those in power thought nothing of causing the deaths of
large numbers of people for their own purposes, never mind that Hitler, Stalin,
and others put them to shame in that regard in much more recent times. Ancient
people could even imagine God ordering a king to kill every living thing among
another people as a much delayed act of vengeance. See 1 Samuel 15:1-3. When we
read texts from the ancient world we must try to understand how violent life in
that world could be and how much less individual human lives were valued then
than we value them now.
It is then less surprising
than we may think that ancient writers would express approval of hatred,
killing, and even infanticide. Those things were if anything more common and more
widely expected if not approved in that world than in ours. We don’t know when
most of the Psalms were written, Psalm 137 actually being an exception to that
rule. We do know that ancient Israel could express profound and powerful truth
about God and human spirituality. Just as clearly however ancient Israel had
not yet outgrown the ancient practice of attributing very human thoughts and
emotions to God including the most base of them. (Some people still make that
mistake today, but never mind.) The ancient Hebrews could still believe that
God shared and approved human emotions like hatred and actions like revenge.
Few if any Jews (except maybe the most radically conservative of them) believe
that today, but today’s Jews didn’t write the Psalms. Ancient Jews did. So we
find there great spiritual falsehood alongside great spiritual wisdom. We might
wish it were otherwise, but it isn’t.
The Psalms are
human creations from an ancient world So with the Psalms as with everything
else in the Bible we cannot simply accept everything we read there as divine
truth. Some of what we find there is divine truth, but some of it very clearly
isn’t. To some of it we can say a heartfelt “Yes!” To some of it we must say an
equally heartfelt “No!” The discernment of what to accept and what to reject is
ours. We can’t avoid it. We can and should ask God for guidance in our
discernment. We Christians can and should look to Jesus as giving us the
standard for our discernment, the standard of love. Many faithful Jewish people
actually apply the same standard, for the rabbis of all times teach that
everything in the Bible is about love. The one thing we cannot do is not
discern the true from the false in the Bible. May God help you, and me, as we
do that sacred work.
[1]
See Thomas Calnan Sorenson, Liberating the Bible, A Pastor’s Guided Tour for
Seeking Christians, Revised Edition, Volume 2, The Old Testament
(Briarwood, NY: Coffee Press, 2019) 227-239.
[2] Book
of Common Worship Daily Prayer (Louisville, Kentucky:
Westminster/John Knox Press, 1993).
No comments:
Post a Comment