Friday, January 16, 2026

More on Trump's Fascism

  

On Donald Trump’s Fascism 

January 16, 2026 

It becomes more and more obvious every day that Donald Trump is not only an American fascist but that he iss using fascist techniques to impose his will on not only the United States of America but on the whole world. What are some of those techniques: 

  1. Have an innocent demographic that you accuse of being responsible for all of your country’s problems, then use violence against them. For Hitler that was the Jews. For Stalin (a Communist who functioned like a fascist), it was counterrevolutionaries. For Trump, it is immigrants legal or otherwise be they citizens or not. 

  1. Make people disbelieve in the reality of truth. Lie, lie, lie, the lie some more. Not because you want people to believe the lies, though you’re perfectly happy if they do,  but because you want them not to believe that there is no such a thing as truth. To believe that they can trust no one to tell them the truth.  

  1. Suppress what we in America call constitutional rights, most especially the rights of freedom of speech, of the press, and of peaceful assembly. 

  1. Censor everything published or broadcast in the country. Prohibit any expression of opposition. 

  1. Make opponents enemies. In a democracy, people of different political opinions vie in the public square for public support. They may not like each other. They consider the other’s policy positions to be dangerous and destructive. But they don’t call opponents enemies. They don’t think political opponents deserve execution. Fascists cannot tolerate opposition, so they turn opponents into enemies and say they deserve to be killed. In classical fascist systems, they actually kill them, sometimes by the millions. 

  1. Have some sort of paramilitary group of thugs that you employ against those “enemies.” Hitler had the Gestapo and the SS. Stalin had the NKVD. Trump has ICE. He has violent paramilitary organizations on standby. He if fully willing to use all of these institutions against advocates of democracy. 

  1. Centralize political, military, and police power in one person, one Supreme Leader. For the Nazis, of course, that was Hitler, whom they called “der Fűhrer,” the leader. Soviet Communists of his time called Stalin the “Vozhd,” which also means leader. Fascist regimes may retain outwardly democratic political structures, but, in reality, there is nothing democratic about them. 

  1. In fascist systems, the leader exercises that unlimited political, military, and police power only for the benefit of the leader’s fascist regime. The leader may do that through nominally constitutional institutions, but, in fact, the leader is in complete control of the country. 

  1. Convince the people that only that supreme leader can solve their country’s problems.  

  1. Glorify the leader beyond all reason. Make him (it’s always a him) infallible. Make any opposition to him or even questioning of him sedition. Make everyone pledge allegiance to him. Hitler required even Christian pastors to take the Hitler oath. Yours truly will never, under any circumstances, take a Trump oath. 

  1. Claim to be working for the people while actually creating a privileged power elite above the people. 

  1. Greatly increase the wealth of the leader and his closest supporters through both legal and illegal means. 

  1. Have no scruples whatsoever about using murderous violence against perceived enemies or against people you want the country’s people to believe are enemies. Have no scruples against violence even to the point of committing genocide. Hitler did it against the Jews. Stalin did it against the Ukrainians. Trump hasn’t committed genocide yet, but then, he’s just getting started. 

  1.  Seek to expand the part of the world under the leader’s control. Hitler did it by invading and conquering most of western and central Europe. Stalin did it by being part of the Soviet Communists’ conquest of most of what had been the Russian Empire and by entering into a coalition with another fascist, Hitler, that allowed the Soviet Union to occupy and absorb the three Baltic Republics and parts of Poland that became part of the Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine. 

  1. Care nothing about the opinions or interests of any nation. Only the fascist leader’s opinions matter. 

  1. Claim the right to do anything internationally with no negative consequences or negative responses by any other nation or international organization. No one, domestic or foreign, has the right to criticize the fascist leader. 

So what is a fascist regime? It is a system of government grounded in a supreme leader’s megalomania and lust for power. It is established and maintained through violence or other illegal means. Even is it is established through legal mechanisms, as Hitler’s was, it comes to be maintained through violence and fear. It functions only for the benefit of its leader and a small group of the leader’s closest supporters. It panders to non-political power structures, such as economic systems and institutions, only to coopt them and make them supporters. Or, as Stalin did, it simply destroys all non-political power structures so that they cannot be centers of opposition.1 

Perhaps the good news is that Most fascist régimes don’t last very long. Italy’s Mussolini, the protopicalfascist, ruled Italy only from 1922 to 1943. Hitler’s fascist regime lasted only for twelve years, from 1933 to 1945. Stalin ruled from roughly 1929 to his death in 1953.2 The Soviet regime that followed him certainly was nothing close to democratic, but at least it wasn’t nearly as murderously violent as Stalin had been. Mao Zedong was head of the Chinese state from 1949 to 1959 and effectively in control of the country as head of the Chinese Communist Party until his death in 1976. The Communist regime in China that followed him, like the Communist regime that followed Stalin in the USSR, was, and is, in no way democratic; but it, however, was, and is, less fascist than Mao had been if only because it was and is somewhat less murderously violent.3 It is too early to say how long Trump’s would-be truly fascist regime will last in the United States. 

Donald Trump truly is an American fascist in the sense I have outlined here. Every one of these criteria either applies to what Trump has done or is doing or points to something he will do if he thinks he can get away with it. He has not succeeded in turning the United States into a truly fascist nation, at least not yet. No one, I trust, is going to arrest or murder me for writing this post and posting it online. Yet there is no doubt that he will turn us into a truly fascist nation if he can. He is clearly a megalomaniac. He clearly sees opponents as enemies deserving death. He has expressly said as much. He uses force as much as he has so far been able to use to exert his power and suppress all of his opponents. Clearly, he will establish as much of a truly fascist regime as his country allows him to establish. 

Which means that it is up to us to stop him. I am an adherent of Christian nonviolence, so I will never advocate stopping him violently; but we must all use every nonviolent means available to us to stop him from turning our country truly fascist. How do we do that? By speaking out. By demonstrating against Trump and essentially everything the executive branch of the federal government he heads does. By voting, for as long as we still have the right to vote for candidates of any political party with the guts to stand up to him and say “No,” and, those for whom we vote who are to be members of Congress have the guts to vote against him every time. By supporting nongovernmental organizations like the ACLU that take the Trump administration to court over its myriad violations of the law (and often win). By bombarding our senators and representative with phone calls and email telling them to oppose everything the Trump administration wants to do.  

Folks, short of violence, which I will not advocate, nothing is too much for us to do to try to stop Trump’s fascist takeover not only of our government but of our entire nation. I wish I had a magic wand that could make him to away, but I don’t. I do still have my constitutional right of free speech; and, for now at least, so do you. So let’s speak out. Let’s cry out. Let’s scream out. Let’s demand that our elected representatives do everything they can to stop Trump. Let us demand that our state governments, some of which at least are anti-Trump, do whatever they can do to stop him in their states. Nothing we can do amounts to too much. We face a true crisis. We face a turning point in American history. Will we turn to fascism, or will we return to the ideals America has always espoused, as woefully inadequately as we have put them into practice. It may well be up to us which we way we turn. So let’s yank any steering wheel we have and do what we can to stop the American fascist Donald Trump. The future of our country, and perhaps the future of the world, depends on it. 

Saturday, January 3, 2026

Donald Trump Is an International Criminal

 This is something I just wrote in my personal, offline journal.

60103 Saturday

Last night our asshole president attacked the sovereign nation of Venezuela and kidnapped the head of its government. I have no words for how outraged I am by this grossly immoral and illegal act. I won’t try to express my feeling here any more than that because I can’t. We have become a rogue nation. I am ashamed to be an American.

Is what Trump did an impeachable offense? Yes, it is. The US Constitution provides for the impeachment and removal from office of a president guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” It doesn’t specify under whose law a president must have committed a high crime. Therefore, it seems, any law is sufficient. What Trump did is probably illegal under US constitutional and statutory law because he did it without even notice to Congress much less congressional approval. What Trump did is undeniably illegal under international law. If Congress or the US courts won’t try and convict Trump, the International Court of Justice in The Hague must do it. In any event, that court must declare Trump an international criminal subject to arrest in any nation in which he dares to set foot. That, of course, won’t happen because the US is too powerful and internationally significant; but it sure as hell should

Friday, January 2, 2026

Comments on American Idiocy

 There are, of course, a lot more aspects to American idiocy that the one this comment is about. I mean, this country made the moronic, deranged idiot Donald Trump president not once but twice. What more proof of idiocy do you need? But this is a comment I just wrote in my personal journal, which, mostly I don't make public.

\I find so much television advertising so offensive, so fucking stupid, that I’m starting to wonder why I watch any commercial television. I don’t watch much, sports mostly—football and baseball in season. Otherwise, what the hell is there on commercial television worth putting up with have your intelligence insulted again and again and again? The marketers know that most Americans are morons, so they pander to morons. I’m not the smartest guy in the world. I have some kinds of intelligence and don’t have others. But I’m no moron. I won’t buy into moronic images and messages. They turn me off—or worse. If you ever needed proof that Americans are morons, just look at television advertising. It insults people who aren’t morons at every turn. Commercial television isn’t much better. It’s either done on the cheap so the producers don’t have to pay writers and actors, or it’s filled with violence, which, I guess, we’re supposed to find entertaining. It’s not entertaining. It’s a violation of everything I consider holy—nonviolence and love. Oh well. There’s nothing to do but not watch it. Which, mostly, I don’t. Americans are not going to stop being morons. It’s a foundational part of our culture that intelligence is suspect. That morons know better than experts. That people who know what they’re talking about are somehow suspect. It is one of my country’s fatal flaws, but there it is, and it’s not going to change. Damn!

Friday, November 28, 2025

A Stunning Development

 

A Stunning Development

November 28, 2025

Something of remarkable if somewhat obscure importance happened recently. This year marks the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, held across the Bosporus from Constantinople in the year 325 CE. The Council, the first of seven ancient Ecumenical Councils, is important mostly because it formulated the Nicene Creed. In its original form, that creed read:Top of Form

 Bottom of Form

We believe in one God,
the Father almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
begotten from the Father before all ages,
God from God,
Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made;
of the same essence as the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven;
he became incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary,
and was made human.
He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered and was buried.
The third day he rose again, according to the Scriptures.
He ascended to heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again with glory
to judge the living and the dead.
His kingdom will never end.

And we believe in the Holy Spirit,
the Lord, the giver of life.
He proceeds from the Father,
and with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified.
He spoke through the prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church.
We affirm one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look forward to the resurrection of the dead,
and to life in the world to come. Amen.

The Nicene Creed is important first of all because it is one of the earliest expressions of the substance, or at least what the church at the time contended to be the substance, of the Christian faith. To this day, Christians around the world recite it in worship. I belong to a Christian denomination that prides itself on being noncreedal, so we don’t recite it is worship. Still, it remains a foundational document of the Christian faith today, 1,700 years after it was written.

Now, the most important part of the Nicene Creed for my purposes here is the statement that the Holy Spirit “proceeds from the Father.” That’s particularly important because over the centuries after 325, Christians in western Europe, but not in eastern Europe or the eastern Mediterranean, changed it. Without calling another ecumenical council to change it, they began to say that the Holy Spirit proceeds from “the Father filioque,”  that is, from the Father “and the Son.” That is not what the Creed originally said, and eastern Orthodox Christianity has never accepted it.

Now, we needn’t get into the weeds of what difference it makes theologically to say the Holy Spirit “proceeds from the Father” or “from the Father and the Son.” That theological distinction is, in any event, something most contemporary Christians of whatever stripe neither understand nor care about at all. What matters for our purposes is that “the filioque,” the insertion of the phrase “and the Son” into the Nicene  Creed, became one of only two theological differences between Eastern Orthodox Christianity and westernChristianity.[i]

The filioque, as the reference to “the Father and the Son” is always called, became one ot the two theological issues that led to the schism between Constantinople and Rome. In 1054 CE, the Pope excommunicated the Patriarch of Constantinople, and the Patriarch of Constantinople excommunicated the Pope. The filioque has remained a bone of contention between Eastern Orthodox Christianity and Roman Catholic Christianity ever since.

Then, very recently, something remarkable happened. Pope Leo XIV said and did a couple of things that are revolutionary in the context of the East-West split over the filioque. He referred to the Nicene Creed without the filioque as the foundational statement of the Christian faith. And he recited the Creed with the Patriarch of Constantinople without the filioque! We contemporary, Protestant Christians probably want to say: So what?

Well, in the context of the centuries old split between Eastern and Western Christianity, so a great deal. For many centuries, no Pope has recognized the Nicene Creed without the filioque as a legitimate expression of the Christian faith. Now Pope Leo XIV appears to have done so. The Roman Catholic Church essentially never makes that kind of change in its foundational theology. That Church teaches that it is infallible in its theological stances. To change that theology is to admit that the Church had made a mistake in the past, something that it contends is impossible because of the alleged relationship between the Church and God.

Now, the Roman Catholic Church has not officially changed its position on the filioque. The Church still uses the Creed with the filioque not without it. But the Pope has at least very nearly conceded that the Nicene Creed without the filioque is a legitimate expression of the Christian faith. In the context of the well over

 one thousand years long split between Eastern and Western Christianity in which the filioque played a major role, the Pope doing that is indeed revolutionary. Will it lead to anything? It’s too early to say. Still, I find it hard to underestimate the importance of what the Pope has done.



[i] The other was the Pope’s claim of superiority over the other Patriarchs of the Church, the Patriarchs of Alexandria, Jerusalem, Antioch, and Constantinople. It needn’t concern us here.