On Salvation: Luke’s
Story of Lazarus and the Rich Man
I was recently
discussing Luke’s story of Lazarus and the rich man with a small group of
people at a local retirement facility. You’ll find that story at Luke 16:19-31.
In it a rich man lives in luxury while a beggar named Lazarus suffers at the
rich man’s gate longing to eat the crumbs that fall from the rich man’s table.
Both of them die. Lazarus rests in the bosom of Abraham. The rich man suffers
in the agonies of Hades. Abraham refused to relieve the rich man’s suffering
saying that he received good things in his lifetime while Lazarus suffered. This
story is one of the very few places in the Bible where people appear in an
afterlife that involves reward and punishment. In it Lazarus is rewarded but
not because he is said to have been righteous or moral or because he had the
proper faith but only because he suffered during his life on earth. The only
thing we know about the rich man’s behavior is that he lived in luxury and did
nothing to help Lazarus, the suffering beggar lying at his gate. The moral of
the story is relatively clear. God blesses the poor and calls us to do what we
can to relieve their suffering. There are lots of nuances in this story that we
could discuss, but what I’ve given you here is enough for what I want to say
about it.
One of the
people with whom I was discussing this story at the local retirement facility
was someone I hadn’t met before. She identified herself as Free Methodist. All
I know about the Free Methodists is that their theology is extremely
conservative. I believe that they read the Bible as the literal word of God. In
the course of our discussion this woman wondered if Lazarus were a Christian.
Somehow I managed not to laugh at the question, although it is absurd for
anyone with any sophisticated Christian theology at all. First of all Luke
attributes the story to Jesus, and in Jesus’ time there was no such thing as a
Christian. Jesus didn’t call people to be Christians, he called them to a new
way of understanding and following God in a thoroughly Jewish context. The
story says nothing at all about Lazarus’ faith. It doesn’t even say he is
Jewish much less Christian. So reading anything into the story about his faith
would be rank speculation. The question is absurd and hardly worthy of an
answer.
Yet that
question is grounded in a conservative Christian theology that has been and is wide-spread
and immensely destructive in the world. I can think of only one reason why this
good woman would wonder whether Lazarus were Christian. In the story Lazarus is
saved. He goes to the bosom of Abraham, which we can take as an image of a
blissful life in heaven after death. I am sure that this woman has been taught
and has accepted the notion that only Christians are saved. Therefore, since in
the story Lazarus is saved, he must be a Christian. In order to be true to what
she believes Christianity to be this woman had to find a way to understand
Lazarus as Christian. To her the question of Lazarus’ possible Christianity is
not absurd at all. It fits perfectly with what she has been taught and
apparently accepted about the Christian faith.
Yet the story of
Lazarus and the rich man brings the theology behind the woman’s question into
doubt. Yes, in the story Lazarus is saved and the rich man is condemned. Yet
Lazarus isn’t saved and the rich man isn’t condemned because of any faith they
may or may not have had. Lazarus is saved only because he suffered in his life
on earth. The rich man is condemned only because he lived well during his life
on earth and did nothing that we know of to help those who suffer. These
characters’ faith, if they had any, has nothing to do with their respective
fates in the story. Salvation doesn’t come to Lazarus because he believed the
right things about Jesus Christ. It doesn’t come to him because, as the women
I’m talking about put it, he took Jesus into his heart. Salvation comes to
Lazarus only because he suffered in life. It seems that dynamic is something
the good woman at my gathering could neither accept nor even comprehend.
The story of
Lazarus and the rich man is only one passage in the New Testament that suggests
that Jesus wasn’t at all about getting people to believe in him and thus be
saved. Jesus was about how people live, not about what happens to them after
they die. The story of Lazarus and the rich man uses imagery about fate after
death not to make a point about fate after death but to make a point about how
we are to live this life. The story makes a point similar to Matthew’s “insofar
as you have done it to the least of these you have done it to me.” Done what?
Not tried to make them Christian. After all, it wouldn’t make much sense for
people to be called to make Jesus Christ Christian. Rather, Christ calls us to
feed, clothe, and visit those in need. He calls us to acts of charity and lives
committed to social and economic justice. That is what the story of Lazarus and
the rich man teaches, not that you have to believe certain things to be saved.
This woman’s
question about Lazarus being Christian is not only grounded in a fundamental
misunderstanding of what Jesus was about. Perhaps even more dangerously it is
grounded in Christian exclusivism. It assumes that Christianity understood as
accepting certain propositions about Jesus of Nazareth to be true (or “taking
Jesus into your heart”) is the only way to salvation. There are passages in the
New Testament that can be read to support that conclusion. Whether those
passages actually mean that is an important question but one I won’t go into
here. My point for now is that the largest and most vocal parts of the
Christian tradition have for centuries proclaimed that Christian exclusivism is
God’s own truth. For these people belief in Jesus Christ is the only way to
salvation.
That conviction
has had disastrous consequences both in predominantly Christian regions and
around the world. At its worst it has led European nations to force conversions
to Christianity at gun or spear point. Even in its least offensive form it has
made Christians feel superior to people of other faiths or of no faith. It has
led efforts such as those at the old Indian schools in our country to
disrespect native languages, cultures, and faiths and to efforts to convert
native people not just to Christianity but to Victorian cultural and sexual
norms and prejudices. It has been a major factor in European and American
anti-Judaism, a centuries-old hatred that culminated in the Holocaust. It has caused
Christians to disregard and reject the contributions of non-Christians to world
culture. All in all Christian exclusivism has been a very bad thing in world
history.
Moreover, it
just doesn’t make any theological sense. It posits that God has created only
one way to be right with God, a way that happens to be our way. All other ways
supposedly lead not to God but to perdition. Extreme Christian exclusivism even
says that all the people who lived before Jesus Christ are damned because they
didn’t believe in Jesus. It says that everyone who has lived in parts of the
world where Christianity is hardly heard of and in which it is strongly
countercultural are damned because they don’t believe in Jesus. Really? That’s how
God has structured the world? No, that is not how God has structured the world.
It can’t be how God has structured the world. Only a God who hates and is
willing to condemn most of the people who ever lived would structure a world
that way, yet even Christian exclusivists say that God is a God of love for all
people. Their favorite Bible verse begins “For God so loved the world.” John
3:16a. It simply is not possible to reconcile Christian exclusivism with a God
of love.
So let’s be done
both with the notion that what God wants from us is certain cognitive assumptions
about Jesus, and let us be done with Christian exclusivism. These things are
killing Christianity in the world today because their falsity is becoming more
and more obvious. Salvation isn’t about belief. It isn’t even primarily about
life after death. Salvation for the follower of Jesus Christ is found in this
life in conforming one’s life to the will and ways of God as revealed in and
through Jesus. In Jesus’ parable Lazarus isn’t saved because he believed the
right things. He is saved because God loved him despite or actually because of
his suffering. To that truth let all the people say: Amen!
No comments:
Post a Comment