Tuesday, July 15, 2025

To Prophesy Justice

 This is the text of a sermon I gave at Monroe Congregational United Church of Christ in Monroe, Washington, USA, on Sunday, July 13, 2025

To Prophesy Justice

For

Monroe Congregational UCC

July 13, 2025

 

Scripture: Psalm 82

 

Let us pray: May the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of our hearts be acceptable in your sight O God, our strength and our redeemer. Amen.

 

You’ve all heard it before. You all know it. We live in hard times. There are lots of things going on in the world that make times hard. There are wars in various places around the world. There is hunger, starvation even, in places around the world. There is political oppression in various places around the world. Because of what I did in an earlier stage of my life (get a PhD in Russian history), the oppression and the war that hit closest to home for me all have to do with Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin’s Russia. That country keeps committing crimes against humanity in Ukraine just as Israel keeps committing crimes against humanity in Gaza.

There are hard times in our country today too. Since January 20, 2025, we have lived under a presidential administration that is creating hard times in our country perhaps more than any presidential administration in our country’s history. I won’t go through all the specifics of the harm our federal government is doing these days. You all know those details at least as well as I do. Suffice it to say that our federal government has allied itself with the wealthy against the poor and with authoritarians against our American democracy. I know that many of you are as appalled about what’s going on in our country as I am, and that is deeply appalled indeed.

Now, I assume that at least most of you here identify yourselves as Christians, at least to yourselves if not so much publicly. And I assume that for at least most of you being Christian has consequences for your life. I assume, and hope, that it has consequences for how you live your personal, private lives. And, as I’m sure you already know, being Christian has consequences for our lives as citizens of this nation and of God’s world too What are those consequences? There are lots of them, and we see some of them in our scripture this morning, Psalm 82.

Psalm 82 sets a rather odd stage, doesn’t it. It gives us God speaking to a “divine council.” It says God speaks “in the midst of the gods.” There is, of course, only one God, but, as you may or may not know, it took ancient the ancient Israel from which this text comes centuries to discern that truth. Here we have what seems to me to be asort of a halfway house on the road to monotheism. God is upper case G God, but here there are also lower case g gods over whom upper case G God presides. Hebrew scripture never makes it clear who these lower case g gods are supposed to be, but clearly they possess some sort of ruling power over God’s people. Otherwise, why would God say to them what God says to them in this Psalm? This passage isn’t about individuals doing charity. It is about those in power doing justice.

God says to these so-called gods: “How long will you judge unjustly and show partiality to the wicked? Give justice to the weak and the orphans, maintain the right of the lowly and destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy.” Psalm 82:2-4. These three verses are among the Bible’s most terse, most direct statements of God’s demand for justice and of what that justice really is.

First of all, God is clearly demanding that “the gods” do God’s justice. It seems that they haven’t been doing that, and God has had it with them. God accuses them of judging unjustly and of showing “partiality to the wicked.” Here God is telling them to knock it off. To stop doing what they have been doing. But God does more than tell them to stop doing things wrong. He gives them an order to do something too. And that order is all about justice.

Now, here’s the thing. God isn’t concerned about justice for God. God far transcends any need for concepts like justice to apply to God. No, God is concerned about the people Jesus called the “least of these.” See Matthew 25:40. Here God calls these people “the weak, the lowly, and the destitute.” In other words, God is telling the lower case g gods to do justice for people in need. People who don’t have enough to live on. People the wealthy and powerful ignore at best and oppress at worst most of the time. God is saying to them: If you’re going to use your power to rule over people, you must do it by doing justice.

Hebrew prophecy was mostly about speaking God’s truth and, in particular, speaking it to power not about predicting the future. It was about speaking truth to power, which at least some of the ancient Hebrew prophets did as forcefully as they could. They excoriated those with economic and political power for oppressing the poor and the vulnerable. Amos put it this way: “Let justice roll down like water and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.” Amos 5:24. Ancient Israel needed prophets like Amos because her rulers often ruled very unjustly. And we certainly need prophets like that today for the same reason, don’t we? Yes, we do. There’s an awful lot of unjust ruling going on among us, isn’t there.

We need prophets today. We need lots of them. So let me turn your attention to another passage from Hebrew scripture about prophets. This story is set in the wilderness of Sinai after the people have left Egypt but before they make it to Canaan. Moses selects seventy elders. He takes them to “the tent” outside the people’s camp. There “they prophesied.” Two men, one named Eldad and the other named Medad, weren’t among the seventy elders that Moses chose. Rather, they were back in the camp; yet they too prophesied. A young man from the camp runs to Moses and tells him that Eldad and Medad were prophesying back in the camp. Another man tells Moses to make them stop. Moses doesn’t. Rather, he says: “Are you jealous for my sake? Would that all the Lord’s people were prophets….” You’ll find that verse at Numbers 11:29.

“Would that all the Lord’s people were prophets.” Given what we’ve learned about what a prophet is, what does that mean for us? What would all God’s people do if they were prophets?  Folks, what we’d do if we were God’s prophets is we’d denounce our country’s unequal and unjust distribution of wealth. We’d denounce our country’s racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, militarism, and all other kinds of injustice and violence. We’d demand that our country do justice for those in need in our country, and there are millions of them.

Folks, we need more prophets, and that means that the answer to our dearth of prophets speaking truth to power is for us, each and every one of us to be a prophet. I am convinced that today God calls all of us to be prophets. That means, for each and every one of us to become people who speak God’s truth to power. That means speak God’s truth about God’s demand of justice for the poor and the weak. That justice isn’t due process of law, or at least it isn’t only or primarily that. It is rather what theologians call “distributive justice.” The best way to describe distributive justice is to say that it a system of human organization in which everyone has enough because no one has too much. That is what God is calling each and every one of us to proclaim to those in power in our nation.

I can’t tell any of you how you can do that. None of us has a big public microphone with which we could prophesy to large numbers of people. But we can all so something. We can all call our congressional representatives and tell them to do what is right not what is wrong when proposed legislation comes before them. We can all write letters to the editor of our local papers, something yours truly has done on occasion. We can all talk to our friends and family. Sure, they probably aren’t in power, but they too can talk to people who are.

We all have different skills and different abilities, so we must all decide for ourselves how we are going to prophesy. The thing to learn this morning is not specifics about what we are to do exactly. It is to learn that God calls each and every one of us to be a prophet. To speak truth to power however we can. To demand that those in power do justice for all people in need. Doing that isn’t always easy. It’s not likely to make you popular, but then the ancient Hebrew prophets weren’t popular either. And it got Jesus crucified.  But they all spoke God’s truth anyway. That’s what God calls us to do this morning. So let’s get on with figuring out how we’re going to do, then let’s go do it. OK? Amen.


Saturday, July 5, 2025

On the Fourth of July

 

On the Fourth of July

July 5,2025

I have seen a couple of people on Facebook post Fredrick Douglas’ famous piece “The Meaning of the Fourth of July for the Negro.” In it, he excoriates the United States for its maintenance and tolerance of the brutal, abominable, sinful institution of slavery, and he was perfectly correct in everything he said. The racism that so appalled Douglas and must appall all of us is still with us, and we must continue the civil rights struggle in which Douglas is such a towering figure.

Today, however, on the day after the Fourth of July, I think we need to ask a different though related question, namely: What does the Fourth of July mean to those of us who understand the catastrophic nature of the things we are living through under the Trump administration? To answer that question, we need first to understand just what it is that we’re supposed to be celebrating on that holiday.

In 1776, the thirteen territories that would become the United States were all British colonies. As colonies, they were ruled by the British government in London, and they had no representation in that government. Many of the residents of those colonies believed, with good reason, that the British government under King George III was oppressing them with taxation in the imposition of which they had no say at all. Many of their leading citizens yearned for freedom from what they considered to be the British yoke that was hampering the economic development of the colonies in which they lived. In the summer of 1776, a number of these leading citizens met in Philadelphia as the Continental Congress. On July 2, 1776, representatives of twelve of those colonies (New York abstained) declared that the colonies they represented were free from Great Britain. On July 4, 1776, the Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence.

The second paragraph of the Declaration begins with one of the most famous sentences in US if not in world history: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” This sentence, which Thomas Jefferson wrote, when interpreted in our present context, states the foundational principle of the United States: All are equal. All have an equal right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We can, I think, take the right to the “pursuit of happiness” to mean the right to live one’s life as seems best to the one living it, within the bounds of the law of course.

There are of course many comments and objections that can be made to this sentence. Today we don’t much believe that much of anything is self-evident. We do not put the stock in human reason that the drafters of the Declaration, adherents of the European Enlightenment all, did. We know that by “Men” they meant property-owning white men and no one else including neither women nor Blacks, something to which we must vehemently object.  The Declaration of Independence is far from a perfect statement for us of the truth it seeks to convey.

Nonetheless, it is signing of the Declaration on July 4, 1776, (not the actual vote for independence on July 2) that we celebrate every year with parades, barbecues, and fireworks. We put up American flags all over the place. We thank our military for preserving our independence (something our military hasn’t actually done since 1812, but never mind). Politicians make patriotic speeches. We crow that we are “the greatest country in the world,” (which we aren’t and never have been, but never mind). July 4 is our great national celebration of who we think we are. It is a celebration of the indispensable truth of each person’s right to life, liberty, and the freedom to live as one wishes.

Today that truth is under vicious attack by our nation’s federal government. That attack has been instituted and is led by one man, Donald J. Trump. It seems inexplicable how this country elected this despicable, completely unqualified man president not once but twice, and the second time after he had been given due process of law and convicted of thirty-four felonies. Yet that is precisely what the voters of this country did. The second time they elected him, though not the first time, they gave him a majority of the popular vote. Because the American voting public was so ignorant, so bigoted, and just so downright stupid as to elect this personally immoral, mentally unstable, megalomaniacal criminal as president, we are faced with a great crisis as we celebrate our nation, or contemplate whether or not we should celebrate our nation, in this season of such celebration. The list of outrages the Trump administration has committed is so long one can hardly get one’s head around it, but here I’ll mention just three of them that I believe to be the most serious of all.

First, Donald Trump is leading an assault on the rule of law. Immediately upon becoming president for the second time he pardoned all of the people who had been convicted of crimes committed when he sent his mob to attack the Capitol on January 6, 2021. In doing so he told the world that it is perfectly acceptable for rabid humans to storm and damage important governmental buildings, assault police officers, and interfere with the constitutional functioning of their government. He made a woman Attorney General who has no credentials for the job but who will kiss Trump’s ring whenever he tells her to and will use the Department of Justice as Trump’s personal law firm. He maintains that the president does not have to obey orders from federal courts. The constitution and other American law means nothing to him. He sees it not as the guarantor of public order and personal freedom that it is supposed to be but merely as something that gets in his way as he tries to be an authoritarian not a democratic ruler.

Second, our law, from the constitution on down, establishes and regulates a democratic republic, but Trump does not believe in democracy. He is leading a nationwide effort so to distort our democratic processes that only he and his anointed minions will be able to win elections. The federal government does not conduct elections, the states do (with some federal regulation to prohibit things like racial discrimination in voting); but Trump is trying to force all of the states to adopt undemocratic voting procedures and abandon their own democratic ones for the benefit only of Donald Trump and his MAGA subordinates.

It is tragic, but Trump is today our duly elected president. He, however, will never be satisfied with being a president duly elected by the people of the country of whose national government he is the chief executive. Trump doesn’t like either capital D or small d democratic politicians either here or abroad. He model of leadership appears to be Russia’s Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, an anti-democratic national leader and a war criminal if ever there were one. Trump wants to be America’s Putin. He has not ruled out seeking a third term as president, the constitution limiting him to two terms be damned. He will make himself America’s dictator if he finds a way to do it and we let him get away with it.

Third, there is what Trump and his people are doing to immigrants in this country. His model for what he is doing appears to be the way Hitler treated Europe’s Jews at least up to the point when he started murdering millions of them. When Hitler came to power in Germany in January, 1933, Germany was not in good shape. The country had myriad problems. The Great Depression was on worldwide. Unemployment was high. Germany had not only lost World War I, it had been humiliated by the Treaty of Versailles in numerous profoundly unfair ways. Among other things, it had had to give up territory and was severely restricted in its ability to defend itself militarily. It owed massive war reparations to the victorious allied nations in that war.

Hitler, of course, promised the German people that he and his Nazi party would solve all those problems. He could probably have done that legitimately through proper legal measures, but that is not what he set out to do. Rather, he acted like the fascist he truly was. He created a cult of personality around himself, claiming that only he personally could make Germany great again. He suspended Germany’s laws and political system and made himself the country’s dictator.

And he did something else that fascists do. He gave the people of the country a scapegoat. He blamed the country’s problems on a group of people who had little or nothing to do with them, namely, the Jews. There actually weren’t that many Jews in Germany in 1933. Microsoft Copilot tells me that they made up only .75 per cent of the country’s population. But Hitler grew up and operated in a German culture (and an Austrian one, Austria being culturally and linguistically German) that had been violently antisemitic for centuries. It was common throughout Europe for Christians to call all Jews “Christ killers”, never mind that it was the Romans not the Jews who killed Jesus. Europe had a long history of Christian violence against Jews, violence the church(es) fomented rather than stopped. For example, men going on the Crusades often stopped along the way to slaughter Jews. Spain, England, and other countries had simply expelled all of them. That’s why there were to many of them in central Europe, especially in Poland. The great German Reformer Martin Luther was a despicable antisemite. The ground was fertile for Hitler’s genocide.

Hitler took full advantage of that fact. He told the German people that the Jews caused all of their problems. That claim was patently absurd as a matter of fact, but it didn’t matter. The German people wanted someone to blame for their problems, and Hitler gave them he Jews. He first set out simply to move all German Jews out of Germany. At one point he wanted to move them to Madagascar with only the presence of the British navy stopping him from doing it. When he couldn’t do that, and when it became clear that he would lose the war he had started, he increased the rate at which he slaughtered them to proportions far beyond human understanding. Auschwitz, for example, always a brutal place, became a major center for killing Jews only in 1942.

I’ll give Donald Trump this much credit: He hasn’t started mass extermination of any demographic group the way Hitler did with the Jews. Yet it remains true that Trump is following Hitler’s pattern of bigotry and harm. In true fascist fashion he is giving the American people a scapegoat for what they perceive to be their problems.[1] That scapegoat isn’t primarily the Jews, though Trump and his MAGA fanatics are clearly antisemitic. It is our country’s immigrants.

The United States is, of course, a nation of immigrants and their descendants. I suppose the first immigrants to North America were the people who migrated here from Siberia thousand of years ago. Their descendants are with us today as Native Americans or, perhaps more properly, people of this country’s First Nations. That, however, is not what the word “immigrant” refers to today. The word refers first of all to people who migrated to what became the United States from Europe beginning in the early seventeenth century CE. A very large number of people migrated to this country in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries before the country adopted restrictive immigration laws. I have ancestors who came to this country from various parts of Europe in the seventeenth century and ancestors who came in the nineteenth century, and my family history is far from rare among us Euro-Americans. There were in the nineteenth century also a great many immigrants to this country from Asia, particularly from China. And of course there were the involuntary immigrants African descent most of whom were slaves until 1865 and who were and are people of such African descent right up to the present day.

Euro-Americans, Asian Americans, and African Americans are not, however, who Trump means by immigrants though he certainly is bigoted toward African Americans and others. By “immigrants” means people who came here, or whose parents came here, much more recently. They have come mostly though not exclusively from Mexico, the nations of Central America, and South America. Not all but a great many of them are people of color, not necessarily Black people (though some of them are) but people whose family history includes a large percentage of First Nations heritage. They aren’t white like those of us of pure European heritage are. Many of them don’t speak English, their native language being Spanish or some other tongue. They are in some significant ways different from the majority of the people of the United States.[2] Many of them are relatively easy to identify, though a great many native-born American citizens have ancestors from the places from which these immigrants come and look not dissimilar to them.

These immigrants are not the cause of our nation’s economic or other problems. Most of them are constructive members of society. In fact, it is clear that American agriculture would collapse without them. So would the building trades. Many of them work in the landscaping, hospitality, and other industries. They pay taxes, and those of them who are not here “legally” receive no benefits from those taxes.

Which raises the question of legal versus illegal immigration. Since the 1920s, the United States has had extremely restrictive immigration laws. We have established quotas of people who may move here legally from the other countries of the world. These laws were probably motivated by bigotry toward Jews and Asians, but they apply to everyone. As far as I know, people wishing to move to the US fill those quotas every year. They are the “legal” immigrants among us.

A great many people, however, enter our country without going through immigration process American law, for better or for worse, establishes. They are the “illegal” or “undocumented” immigrants among us. Most of them come from Central America. They come mainly from countries like El Salvador, where poverty is rampant and the government is oppressive and brutal. They come to avoid governmental violence and the poverty that makes it hard for them even to survive. I suppose there are “illegal” immigrants who do not fit that pattern, but most of them do. Microsoft Copilot tells me there were approximately eleven million undocumented immigrants in the country in 2022. They thus make up a grand total of around 0.03% of our country’s population. They don’t make up much more of a percentage today.

Now here’s a truth far too few Americans understand. Under international law, every person has the right to enter a country other than their own for the purpose of seeking asylum. They seek a place of safety from the brutality and poverty of their home countries. They seek a better life for themselves and their children. A great many supposedly “illegal” immigrants come here for that purpose. Whether they qualify for asylum or not isn’t our issue. Our point is that though they did not come here through legal US channels, under international law they are not here illegally. They are exercising a perfectly legal right under that international law.

Though most of them are in fact not here illegally (at least under international law), and though most of them make positive contributions to our country, Trump is using them in very much the same way Hitler used the Jews. They are the scapegoats he is giving his followers. They are a small, vulnerable group, making them a good target for the bigotry of fascists and good scapegoats for our fascist leader to use in this way. Trump has turned ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) into a Gestapo-like force for attacking immigrants and even people who aren’t immigrants but who look to ICE agents like immigrants. These agents cover their faces, making individual agents impossible to identify. They operate largely without warrants. They burst in on businesses and on any sort of public gathering an haul people away. They have generated great fear among not only immigrants but among American citizens who have reason to believe that ICE agents will take them for immigrants.

Once ICE hauls someone away, that person often ends up in what can only be called a concentration camp. The most recently constructed and most infamous of these camps is called Alligator Alcatraz, or sometimes, Alligator Auschwitz though it is not an extermination facility, at least not yet. It is located in marshlands in Florida surrounded by water with alligators obviously present, hence the facility’s popular name. People are sent there and to other detention facilities without due process of law, and they get no due process of law while they are there. Alligator Alcatraz bears a startling similarity to the detention barracks at Auschwitz, a similarity that should be unsettling to all Americans and certainly is to me.

All of that is just some of the abomination taking place in our country today, We call ourselves “ the land of the free,” but an enormous number of us are not free but are held, probably illegally, in ICE detention facilities. We say we are a country governed by laws not by the whims of any person, but today much of our federal government serves not under the law but at the whims of Donald Trump. We call ourselves the world’s longest established republic, and in a sense we are. But our republican (and I mean small r republican here) form of government is under assault by a president who wants to be a dictator and who may think that he already has dictatorial power that others, especially the federal courts, are keeping him from exercising. We are governed not by committed democrats (and I mean small d democrats here) but by an American fascist and those who kneel before him.

So we have to ask: What was there to celebrate yesterday, July 4, 2025? Congress just passed and Trump just signed one of the most unconscionably unfair and destructive pieces of legislation in the country’s history. Are we supposed to celebrate that abomination of a law? Are we supposed to celebrate Trump building (or at least gloating over) concentration camps in alligator-infested swamps? Are we supposed to celebrate the way the president isn’t sure he is obligated to obey the constitution and who thinks the nation’s courts have no power over him? Are we supposed to celebrate Trump’s assault on our democratic system of government? Are we supposed to celebrated his celebrated personal immorality? Are we supposed to celebrate Trump’s fascist campaign against the immigrants among us? Are we supposed to celebrate Trump’s MAGA movement with its irrational anger, bigotry, and violence?

Well, far too many people among us think all of those abominations are good things. They are happy to celebrate the country in which they are taking place. I and a great many others know that these and so many others are disastrous things Trump is doing to our country not good things for it. They make celebration of our country in the tradition of the Fourth of July simply impossible for me and for a great many others. Yes, my country was founded on principles of democracy and freedom, though it has never lived up to those principles as much as it claims to have done. But my country today is a political and social wasteland. It is ruled by a mob of wholly irrational people who made the least qualified man ever to hold the office president not once but twice. A mob that celebrates illegality and authoritarianism at the highest levels of our national government.

So no, I did not celebrate yesterday. I will not be able to celebrate my country in any way at all until we wake up from the nightmare of Donald Trump. Yes, something of world significance happened on July 4, 1776. Yes, the Declaration of Independence is in many ways one of the most powerful and significant documents in human history. But my country lives under a dark cloud, the dark cloud of the fascist Donald Trump. He distorts and rots nearly everything about my national government, and his congressional acolytes facilitate his doing it. At the ends of their sacred Seder meal Jews often say: “Next year in Jerusalem.” Today I say, maybe some day in America, but not today. Not yesterday. No July Fourth until we are rid of Donald Trump and his American fascism. May that day come much sooner than later.



[1] And he tells them that their problems are far worse than they really are. Fascists need a people in despair if they are going to become true totalitarians.

[2] I first wrote “America” not “United States” here, but then it dawned on me that most of these immigrants also come from America, just other parts of the Americas than most of us do.

Friday, July 4, 2025

On Legal Equality and Class Inequality

 

On Legal Equality and Class Inequality

July 4, 2025

 

Hannah Arendt is one of the great political thinkers of the twentieth century. She coined the term “totalitarianism,” and her book, The Origins of Totalitarianism, is one of the most important books of that late, unlamented century. Early in the book she is discussing what she presents as the creation essentially of a new kind of antisemitism in the late eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries. We needn’t go much into that discussion here, but on page 18, at least page 18 of the Kindle edition I’m reading, of The Origins of Totalitarianism, discussing developments in those centuries, Arendt writes: “The fundamental contradiction between a political body based on equality before the law and a society based on the inequality of the class system prevented the development of functioning republics….” Her contention is that while the new nation states of that period of history made everyone equal before the law, in reality there was still a class system in those states that contradicted the equality the law posited. The tension between the equality of all in the legal systems and the inequality in society and the economy in those states prevented them from functioning in the way theory said they should function.

Now, despite my having a PhD in nineteenth century Russian history, I’m not much interested in late eighteenth and nineteenth century Europe here. But as Arendt does so often in this book, which was written seventy-five years ago, this statement caused me to ask as soon as I read it: Is the tension between the equality before the law that the US Constitution posits and the socioeconomic realities of American life part of the dynamic that today threatens to destroy the American republic that has been functioning for well over two hundred years? I think that it may well be doing precisely that. At least I’m sure that the question of whether it is or not is worth some serious consideration.

The first question we must ask is: Does American law establish the equality of all persons before the law? The answer, in theory at least, is yes. Two amendments to the US constitution contain provisions that establish this legal principle. In the Fifth Amendment we read: “nor shall any person be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law….” This amendment requires the federal government, though not the states, to treat all persons as equal before the law by giving everyone due process. The Fourteenth Amendment, which applies to the states but not to the federal government, is more specific. It reads in relevant part: “Nr State shall…deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” These two amendments establish the principle of equality before the law in both federal and state law.

Neither of them uses the phrase “equality before the law,” but it is easy enough to see how they establish that principle more or less directly. One of the key phrases in both of them is “any person.” Not “any citizen.” Not “any legal resident.” Not “Any person except people not here legally. It says: “Any person.” Since all legal rights pertain only to persons, the provisions of these two amendments apply to everyone. The amendments make no exceptions. Any person, that is, any human being, present within the jurisdiction of any state or of the United States is guaranteed equality before the law either directly or indirectly. There is of course an enormous body of court decisions interpreting these provisions, but none of that law does or could completely disregard the principle of equality before the law.[1]

There is one tragic caveat we must insert here. On July 1, 2024, the US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in the case of Trump vs. The United States. That case, against all valid legal logic, establishes that there is a constitutional basis for the president having immunity from criminal indictment or prosecution for criminal acts that relate to “core” or “exclusive” presidential powers. The case doesn’t tell us just what those powers are. This deplorable case also gives the president “at least” presumptive immunity for all other official acts, but no immunity for “unofficial” acts.[2]

What are we to make of this indefensible decision of our Supreme Court? It does not completely negate equality before the law for the president. The president remains criminally liable for “unofficial” acts while in office. The case doesn’t tell us what “unofficial” acts are, but, whatever they are, the president can still be criminally prosecuted for crimes committed that relate to them. The case does, however, eliminate the principle of equality before the law for certain criminal acts a president may commit while in office. Though the court’s decision is indeed legally indefensible to the extent that it gives the president a legal privilege that the US constitution does not provide and that no other person has, one that violates a foundational principle of American law, it does at least retain a small remnant of that legal principle as applying to the president while in office. Despite Trump v. United States, we can conclude that equality before the law remains part of the bedrock of American law.[3]

The next question we must ask is whether or not there is socioeconomic inequality in this country. The answer to that question is so obvious that it hardly needs mentioning. There is indeed extreme socioeconomic inequality in the United States. Despite the country’s persistent claim that all Americans are equal, all Americans are not and never have been socially or economically equal. We have always been a country socially and economically organized on the basis of class, and we still are. One recent analysis has it that the top 0,1% of the population controls as much wealth as the bottom 90%. The top 0.01 percent of the population controls 11.2% of the country’s total wealth.[4] And of course, within the 90% percent of the population, there is income inequality too. We all know that there is an upper middle class and a lower middle class, and they don’t all have the same amount of money or assets. Economic inequality between classes is and always has been the norm in the United States.

There are other inequalities as well. Two of the most glaring are racial inequality and gender inequality. Racism has been part of our country’s culture from the country’s very beginning. White Europeans brought the first kidnapped Africans as slaves to what became the United States in 1619. The economies of southern states were grounded in and depended on racial slavery until 1865, but racism was rampant in the north and the west as well. The south held so firmly to race-based slavery that it took a civil war that still is the deadliest war in the country’s history to eliminate it.

Ending slavery did not, of course, end American racism. In my experience, few white Americans are aware of the extent to which racism has rotted American culture since the Civil War. Throughout the nineteenth and into the twentieth century racial caricatures of Black people were the norm in American popular literature. Jim Crow laws preserved racial discrimination in the south up to the 1960s, and there was de facto if not de jure Jim Crow in the north and the west too. For example, first the territory of Oregon, then the state of Oregon, passed laws prohibiting Blacks from settling in the state in 1844, 1849, 1857, and 1926.[5] With very few exceptions, Blacks have been able to get only low paying, menial, overly physically demanding, and/or dangerous jobs until at least very recently in our history. Racial discrimination still prevails in our job markets and even more so in our judicial systems.

There has also been gender inequality throughout American history. For much of that history, our culture demanded that women were to be only wives and mothers and not to work outside the home. Now, there is nothing wrong, of course, with being a wife and a mother. Both can be a great blessing for a woman who is a wife and/or a mother.[6] The problem in American culture has been that these were the only roles deemed appropriate for women. Yes, for most of our history women could be school teachers and, at least since the Civil War, nurses. Teaching and serving as a nurse are two noble professions to be sure, but, once again, the problem in American culture has been that it has long attempted to limit women to those two and perhaps a very few other professions.

Then there is the right to vote. From the beginnings of our country women did not have the right to vote. Only men could vote. Slaves never had the right to vote, and under Jim Crow, as a practical matter, only white men could safely vote in the south at least after Reconstruction ended in 1877. This unconscionable gender discrimination began to change shortly after the Civil War. Wyoming extended the right to vote and hold public office to women in 1869, the first state to do so.[7] Some but far from all states followed suit. It was not until 1920, however, that the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution extended the right to vote to women nationwide.

There is no doubt that, while equality before the law (except to a certain extent for the president) remains an essential principle of American law, there has been great social, economic, racial, gender, and other discrimination throughout our history. We have made some progress in overcoming that discrimination, but we haven’t made nearly enough of such progress. Social, economic racial, gender, and other tensions continue to be the rule among us.

OK. So we meet Arendt’s two criteria for inequality impairing the functioning of states, but we have ask: Does it make a difference to the functioning of our country’s political entities? The answer is a qualified yes. There is one demographic distinction that is playing an enormous role in American politics today. Throughout American history, white men have been our most privileged class of people. Not all white men have been wealthy. Not all white men have been economically or politically powerful. Yet it remains true that white men as a class have been the most privileged broad group of Americans from the country’s earliest days. Yes, wealthy white men have been more privileged than middle class or poor white men, but all white men have been privileged over women and racial minorities.

Lyndon Johnson is at least supposed to have put it this way when discussing how white men have viewed themselves as privileged over people of color. Using old language we wouldn’t use today (”colored man”), he said: “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

America’s political history since at least the 1960s proves Johnson’s point. At least since the first Nixon presidential electoral victory in 1968, millions upon millions of Americans have consistently voted against their own best interest. They have sent extremely conservative politicians to Congress. They have turned their state governments deep red. They have, in other words, voted for politicians who cared not one whit about them but acted instead in the interest of the wealthy and the big corporations?[8]

The reasons for this tragic shift may be complex, but they all add up to a reality that white American men were feeling even if they couldn’t articulate it. The unjust status quo that privileged white man over all others began to change in quite recent times. In the civil rights movement, Black Americans and their white and other allies rose up against American racial discrimination. In the women’s movement, women and their male and other allies rose up against American gender discrimination. Black Americans have begun to play a much larger and more public role in American life than they ever had before. We even elected a Black president in 2008 and reelected him in 2012.

Women have become more prominent in American life too. We haven’t elected a woman president yet; but we’ve had a woman vice president, and two of our Secretaries of State have been women as have numerous other cabinet officers and members of Congress (though members of Congress are still disproportionately men). Blacks and women have served at every level of state government and have led large corporations and elite universities. Things are indeed changing.

Millions upon millions of white American men feel threatened by these changes. Threatened, that is, with the loss of the privilege they have had until very recently. They fear losing their privilege to Black Americans, that is, people they have always looked down on and even hated. They fear losing their privilege to women, that is, other people they have always looked down on and over whom they have exercised significant control.

And they are responding against their own interest. They are responding in significant part by electing Donald Trump president not once but twice, the second time after he had already been convicted of 34 felonies. They vote for Trump. They wear his red MAGA hats. They go to his rallies. They cheer at his racism. They cheer at his misogyny. They cheer at his xenophobia. They buy his lie that the country’s problems, which are in any event nowhere near as bad as Trump claims, are all the fault of immigrants. They cheer as Trump uses immigrants in exactly the same way as Hitler used the Jews. As I write on July 4, 2025, a great many of them are cheering the passage of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” that is a body blow to the public welfare but which benefits the very wealthy, the very wealthy being the only people Trump cares about other than himself if indeed he even really cares about them at all.

America’s political culture is split as it has rarely been split before. We talk about red states as predominantly Republican and blue states as predominantly Democratic as if the states were politically monolithic. Conservative or even reactionary leaders, including supposedly Christian preachers, have convinced a hoard of people that “liberals” are “socialists” and that socialism is a very bad thing, never mind that socialist policies would benefit most of Trump’s voters. MAGA people won’t listen to people with brains and a conscience, and we on the left just can’t understand how anyone could vote MAGA. We consider those who do to be ignorant, stupid, and/or bigoted.[9] We can’t talk to each other. We don’t understand each other. To a considerable extent, we don’t want to have anything to do with each another.

That divide is a consequence of social and economic inequalities that contradict the notion of the equal protection of the law for all persons. MAGA zealots see equal treatment of minorities, women, and those of other gender identities as discrimination against them. They see enforcement of the separation of church and state as an attack on them and their religion. All of which flows from the country’s changing demographics and white American men’s loss of privilege.

I was going to say that the rift in American politics hasn’t turned violent yet, but that’s not quite true. At the end of his first term as president, Trump unleashed a rabid, violent mob on the US Capitol in an attempt to stop it from doing its constitutional job of certifying Joe Biden as president. They violently assaulted police officers who were just doing their duty. Someone once took a shot at Trump but did little or no harm. A MAGA zealot recently shot at two Minnesota state legislators and their spouses, killing both the woman and the man in one of those couples. We have more armed, disordered people in so-called militias than we have ever had before. Some of them speak of a civil war to rid the country of liberals.

Will the political split in this country that results from social and economic inequalities lead to a new civil war? I pray not, but I have no way of stopping Trump’s armed followers. And, frankly, I wish my home state of Washington and the state in which I grew up, Oregon, could secede from the union so that the red states couldn’t influence my life and the lives there as much as they can now, not that I would fight a war to make that happen. I am, after all, a Christian and an adherent to Jesus’ teaching of nonviolence. Yet I have to wonder: What will happen at the end of Trump’s current term as president? He clearly wants to be president for life, and he doesn’t give a damn that the constitution limits him to two terms. Will his followers turn even more violent this time than they did last time in a criminal attempt to keep him in office?[10] There is no way to know, but the possibility surely exists. How would the US military react to such a violent attempt to keep Trump in power? I hope and pray that they would follow the law, but our military is riddled with MAGA zealots posing as patriotic Americans. At least some of them might well join an armed rebellion and bring their military training and weapons with them.

I don’t know what the future holds. I just know that Hannah Arendt was right when she pointed to social and economic inequality as a cause of major problems for any republic. When, right after the constitutional convention, someone asked Benjamin Franklin what sort of government they had created he said: “A republic, if you can keep it.” Our republic, the one Franklin and other national founders created, is under attack by fearful forces who would take authoritarian rule over democracy as long as the authoritarian in charge were Donald Trump. Let us pray that reason may yet prevail, and we will, as Franklin said, keep our republic.



[1] The Dred Scott decision of 1857 and Plessy v. Ferguson of 1896 are dreadful exceptions to this statement.

[2] https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB11194/LSB11194.2.pdf

[3] Most if not all state constitutions also establish equality before the law for people present within the state.

[4] https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2014/1110/Economic-inequality-in-the-US-reaches-levels-not-seen-since-Great-Depression

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_black_exclusion_laws

[6] That being a wife and/or a mother is not always a blessing for all women does not change the truth of this statement.

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_Wyoming

[8]In a book published in 2004, political analyst and historian Thomas Frank examined this phenomenon in his home state. What’s the Matter With Kansas, How Conservatives Won the Heart of America (Metropolitan Books, 2004),

[9] We’ve got that one correct, but never mind.

[10] Of course, Trump is almost exactly the same age as I am, that is, 78 as I write. Neither of us may live to the next presidential election, though I hope that at least I do.

A Shameful Day

 This is the text of a letter I sent to our local newspaper on July 4, 2025.

Thursday, July 3, 2025, was one of the most shameful days in American history. On that day, Congress passed President Trump's horrendous budget bill. That bill gives massive tax breaks to the wealthy, many of whom pay little or no tax anyway, while slashing services for Americans in need and blowing the federal budget deficit up to unprecedented proportions. Republican promises that they would not touch Medicaid were a lie. Because of this bill, people in dire need will be thrown off Medicaid and others who need to get it won't. Rural hospitals will close. Hungry children will not get food. Charitable organizations will not be able to compensate for these cuts but will have even more demand for their services than they have already. It will take our country years at least to recover from this body blow to the public welfare. It is a shameful time for our country but most of all a shameful time for the Republicans, only a very few of whom spoke out against this despicable law. We can only hope and pray that Republicans will pay the price for this betrayal of public trust in upcoming elections.

Rev. Dr. Thomas C. Sorenson

Thursday, July 3, 2025

Today's Three Facebook Posts

July 3, 2025

Trump has now accomplished what Republicans have been trying to accomplish for decades, yet there is a difference between him and earlier Republicans. Earlier Republicans were socially and economically conservative and were in the pockets of the wealthy and the big corporations, but they weren't fascists. They bought political results with their money, but they never attacked democracy itself, or at least I'm not aware that they ever did to any significant extent. Trump is an American fascist. About that there is not the slightest doubt. He does not believe in democracy. Rather, he wants to be an authoritarian if not totalitarian ruler. He thinks he can issue laws of his own, and they will actually be laws. He says he isn't sure if the president must obey the Constitution, and he disobeys the federal courts that interpret the Constitution and other federal laws all the time. He has turned the Republican Party into a personality cult in much the same way Hitler did with the Nazi Party in Germany and Stalin did with the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the USSR. No, we are not dealing with typical red state politics here, as appalling as red state politics often are. We are dealing with a threat to the rule of law, and that threat controls two-thirds of our federal government and has way too much influence in the third. Will decent Americans wake up and stop Trump and his unthinking followers from accomplishing even more of his goals? Only time will tell.


Republicans have been working for decades to destroy America's social safety net. Perhaps it started with Reagan's "welfare queens." Or perhaps it started when Republicans opposed FDR's New Deal. Nixon was no Trump, but he was no friend of the poor and vulnerable. Republicans have been doing in red states what they want to impose on the rest of us nationally for very long time, doing everything they can to make life for those in need worse than it has to be. And the Democrats have let them get away with it. They let them get away with it nominating people like DINO Bill Clinton and even Barack Obama, who turned out to be nowhere near as progressive as some of us convinced ourselves he would be. Joe Biden is a decent man and was a decent president, but he was hardly a truly radical reformer. Can the Democrats develop a spine and a meaningful program to counter MAGA? Will they? I wish I were more confident that the answer to both of those questions was yes.


We're screwed. Trump and his congressional acolytes have finally succeeded in passing a law that deals a body blow to American's already inadequate social safety net. I just read that some cities are canceling Fourth of July celebrations at least in part out of concerns that ICE would use the gatherings to arrest people. We've reached the stage what people are actively trying not to give the Gestapo a chance to do its dirty work. Sure, we can vote the fascists out of Congress late next year, and we can elect someone who's not a fascist president in 2028. But there is at least as good a chance that we won't as that we will. But who'd ever have thought this country would sink so low that saying things like that is a perfectly reasonable and even necessary evaluation of America slipping into American fascism. Like I said, for now at least, we're screwed.