Monday, October 30, 2023

Rage, Despair, and a Crisis of Faith

 

Rage, Despair, and a Crisis of Faith

Today I can feel nothing but rage and despair. These feelings were provoked yesterday when my wife told me of something she’d seen on the morning TV news. The report was on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza brought on by the criminal attack that Israel is conducting on civilians in that unfortunate enclave. The story showed a little girl standing beside a stretcher. There was a body on the stretcher completely covered by a sheet. The little girl was crying, “Mama! Mama!” That image has eaten at me ever since. How the hell can we do it? Why the hell do we do it? We humans are better at killing each other than we are at anything else. We spend unconscionable amounts of money on the tools of death and destruction. We apply our best technology to the instruments of war. Some of our most capable people devote their lives to our instruments of death. We are geniuses at coming up with justification for going out and killing Lord knows how many of our fellow human beings. How the hell can we do it? Why the hell do we do it?

There is always war going on somewhere. After al-Qaeda killed three thousand Americans out of nothing but blind, irrational hate, my country started two wars, one in Afghanistan and one in Iraq. Afghanis and Iraqis killed quite a few of our troops, and we killed thousands upon thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis. Both of those countries are now disaster areas that may never fully recover. Those wars of ours accomplished absolutely nothing constructive. War rarely does.

Two wars occupy the headlines today. One is Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. The history of relations between Russians and Ukrainians is fraught, but the irrational justification for this war comes down to the demented delusion that Ukrainians are really Russians and that the Russians have not just a right but a duty to force them back under Russian rule. Ukrainians may be closely related to Russians linguistically and culturally, but they are not Russians. Just ask them. They have been striving for recognition of their separate national identity and freedom from Russian domination for at least a couple of centuries. Both the old imperial government of Russia and Putin have claimed that there is no Ukrainian language, that what linguists call the Ukrainian language is really just a dialect of Russian. It isn’t. I can read a good deal of Russian. I can read essentially no Ukrainian. Yes, there are cognates between the two languages. They are, after all, both East Slavic languages. But the notion that Ukrainian is really a kind of Russian is nothing but a Russian imperialistic fantasy.

At least since the end of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1991, Ukraine has been a sovereign nation recognized as such by the international community of nations. Has there been corruption there? Of course there has. There is corruption in most governments and certainly in most fledgling democracies. Is the Ukrainian government fascist like Putin claims? Of course not. The government of President Zelensky was freely and fairly elected by the Ukrainian people. Are the Ukrainians committing genocide against Russians in Ukraine? Of course not. There are many Russian speakers in Ukraine, but most of them consider themselves to be Ukrainian not Russian nationals. Russians and Ukrainians live together perfectly well in Ukraine. Putin’s claim that they do not is damned near hallucinatory.

But what if Putin were right about Ukraine? Would that justify the Russians killing tens of thousands of Ukrainians, destroying Ukrainian cities, committing war crimes against civilians, and abducting Ukrainian children into Russia? Hell no it wouldn’t! There is no conceivable justification for what Russia is doing in Ukraine whatsoever. Russia’s war is doing in Ukraine what war always does. It brings nothing but death, injury, and destruction. We should all hope and pray that somehow the Ukrainians succeed in driving the criminal Russian forces out of their country.

There is another war that hogs the headlines these days even more than the Russian war on Ukraine. It is the conflict I began this piece with. On October 7, 2023, terrorists of the Palestinian organization Hamas attacked Israel. They committed horrific crimes against innocent Israeli citizens. They committed a crime against humanity. There may be explanations of the reasons for their attack, but nothing can justify what those Hamas terrorists did. I want nothing I say here to detract from that horrific truth.

But while there may be explanations of the reasons for Israeli’s massive military response to the October 7 attack, nothing can justify what Israel is doing in Gaza. Yes, Hamas controls Gaza. That doesn’t make everyone in Gaza a terrorist. Most of the people in Gaza by far are innocent civilians like that little girl and her dead mother covered up on a stretcher. Israel has created a humanitarian crisis in Gaza the likes of which the world has rarely seen. And “humanitarian crisis” sounds so clinical. It almost sounds neutral, scholarly, impersonal. But what Israel is doing in Gaza is anything but impersonal. That little girl whose mother the Israelis killed is a specific human being, a child of God. So was her mother. The suffering Israel is inflicting on the Palestinians of Gaza is personal. It kills specific individual people, people whom others love, people with families and with hopes for their children’s futures. It takes parents away from children and children away from parents. What Israel is doing in Gaza is every bit as much a crime against humanity as was the Hamas attack on Israel. Life in Gaza wasn’t easy before the Israeli attacks, but Israel has turned it into a living hell, and there isn’t a shred of justification for it.

As I sit here in my warm, comfortable, safe home, millions of my fellow human beings are living through a hell inflicted on them by other human beings, but that’s nothing new. Human beings have inflicted hell on other human beings for as long as there have been human civilizations. Our modern technology does that far more effectively and efficiently than the spears and arrows of the ancient world, which just makes what we do far worse than what the Roman legions were able to do. And we keep doing it over and over and over again. As if doing it raised no moral questions at all. As if slaughtering each other were a perfectly normal, acceptable thing for us to do. I don’t need to go through an extensive list of our human horrors. We all know about the Holocaust. Many of us know about Stalin’s gulag and the tens of millions of people he killed. Many of us know of the Holodomor, when the Soviets but mainly the Russians starved millions of Ukrainians to death. Many of us have heard of the killing fields of Pol Pot’s Cambodia. We all ought to know more than we do about the millions the Chinese Communists have killed. Yes, we humans are better at inflicting hell on other humans than we are at much of anything else.

And these days more than ever I cry: Why?! And: How can we do it? How can we so glibly kill and maim other people who have every bit as much a right to a decent life as we do? People who are children of God every bit as much as we are. People with hopes and dreams no different from ours. People who love and are loved. People who feel the same pain we feel. People who have the right to die a natural death every bit as much as we do. Why do we do it? How can we do it?

And there is an even more profound question that I’m asking today. I ask: God! How can you let it happen? Why don’t you stop us from doing it? As I drove to church yesterday I said, “God, I can’t stop it, and you don’t stop it!” I thought, if God is really God, God could stop it. God could keep us from doing it. But God doesn’t stop it. God doesn’t keep us from doing it. So today I’m asking in a way I don’t think I ever have before: Is there a God? Is God a reality, or is God just something we’ve made up? Or maybe there is a God of sorts, but God actually can’t stop us from doing what we do to each other. But then I ask: If God can’t stop us from doing it, what the hell kind of God is that? Why should we worship a God like that? Today I must say, beats the hell out of me.

And I ask: Is it possible in the face of all of the horror of human life still to believe in God? To trust God? To worship God? Is it possible for me to keep on devoting my life to the ministry of Jesus Christ to which I have been ordained for more than twenty years? Today all I can say is that I hope that someday, somehow, I will find a way to keep doing it. I’ve done it for so long. It has meant so much to me. I have so proclaimed faith in God in preaching, teaching, and writing. But what I’ve said about God for years sounds hollow today. I’ve said that God is present with humanity generally and with every one of us individually every minute of our lives whether we know it or not. I’ve said that God stands in solidarity with us, wanting only good for us and nudging us in the direction of the realm of God, toward a world of peace and justice, a world in which everyone has enough because no one has too much.

But today I cry: Presence isn’t enough! Solidarity isn’t enough! God, we need more. All the words I’ve spoken and written about God’s presence and solidarity sound not just empty but false. I’ve said God was in the Nazis’ gas chambers and in the pits into which the bodies fell as the SS and other Germans murdered millions of innocent Jewish people. Today I say: What the hell good did that do anyone? I suppose their faith may have given some of them something to hold onto as they were murdered, but they were still murdered. Maybe many different kinds of faith have given people something to hold onto and even something to give them hope as other people subjected them to a living hell on earth. That may have done those people good in a sense, but it didn’t stop those other people from subjecting them to a living hell on earth. Today I say: God, thank you for your presence and solidarity; but God damn it, it isn’t enough!

Is there any way for me to hold onto my decades old belief in and commitment to the ministry of God? I can think of only a couple of things that might do it. One is to remind myself of the times I have felt the presence of a spiritual power in my life. Of the time God lifted me up as I sunk in despair over the death of my wife. Of the beatific vision my wife had as she suffered and neared death that said that both she and I were safe in God’s hands. Will reminding myself of those things save my faith? Maybe, but only maybe.

The other thing I can think of is to let my questions of why and how we can do it remain unanswered and to immerse myself nonetheless in the practices and rituals of the Christian faith the way countless other Christians have done over the millennia. I have long said that we can’t know God in God’s fullness because of our status as creatures not gods. I have insisted that the ultimate questions about who God is and how God is are not just unanswered but are unanswerable. Maybe I need to learn to be satisfied with the question of how God can let all the human horror happen be one of those unanswerable questions. Perhaps doing that, and immersing myself in the Christian faith, can do that, but only perhaps.

I sure as hell don’t have an answer to any of this stuff. Sure. I can talk about God giving us humans free will and not intervening to control our behavior because doing so would violate our free will. But what the hell did the Israelis’ free will mean to that little girl as she cried out for her dead mother? It surely meant not one God-damned thing to her. I can talk, as I have, about how creaturely life must be imperfect because it is not God’s life. But what the hell did our being creatures not gods mean to that little girl as she cried out for her dead mother? It surely meant not one God-damned thing to her. Sure. God was with her. God was mourning with her. What the hell good did that do her? Surely it didn’t do a single God-damned thing for her.

So I carry on. I go on living with my rage, despair, and doubt. I remind myself of those times when God’s presence and solidarity with me meant a lot to me. I remind myself of the times when I have known that God’s presence and solidarity with them has meant a lot to other people. I continue to immerse myself in the practices and rituals of Christianity as much as I ever have, which isn’t nearly as much as perhaps I should have. I go on living with my doubt about the reality of God. I’ve often insisted that doubt is part of the life of faith. Well, I sure am proving the truth of that contention today. Why, God? Why do we do it? How can we do it? Why don’t you stop us from doing it? I have no answers. So be it.

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

On the Election of Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House

This is the text of a letter I sent on October 25, 2023, to the Everett Herald, my local newspaper.


On October 25, 2023, every Republican in the House of Representatives voted to make Representative Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) Speaker of the House. In doing so, they confirmed and strengthened Donald Trump’s control of the Republican Party. They confirmed that the most radical wing of the Republican Party, one that seeks to make abortion illegal nationwide and to dismantle Social Security and Medicare, is what the entire Republican Party has become. They have locked in 2020 presidential election denial as the litmus test of an acceptable Republican. They have reenforced the conviction many of us have that the Republican Party is no longer a legitimate American political party. It is an authoritarian, ultra-right wing movement subservient to one man, Donald J. Trump, who has been indicted four times for multiple felonies and who uses the MAGA movement only for his own benefit. The election of Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House is a symptom of how far the American political system has fallen. I can only hope and pray that by one year from now enough Americans will have woken up enough to the threat the Republican Party poses to American democracy and to common decency to deny them both the White House and control of either house of Congress. If they have not, we can kiss American democracy good-bye.

Monday, October 9, 2023

Do I Need to Reconsider?

 

Do I Need to Reconsider?

Donald Trump and the Ransom Theory of Salvation

 

There have been at least three different soteriologies, that is, three different theologies of salvation, in the Christian tradition. One of them, the classical theory of atonement, also called substitutionary sacrificial atonement, is truly terrible theology though it has virtually swallowed the Christian faith whole. Another of them, theology of the cross, is my soteriology. I have developed it rather extensively on this blog and in my books. The third one is called the ransom theory. It is the most common soteriology in the New Testament. It says that we humans are captive to sin because the devil has kidnapped us away from God. Our problem is that the devil holds us in bondage to sin, and there is nothing we can do about it on our own. We will be free from sin, or at least be able to be free from sin, only when a price is paid to the devil higher than any price we mere humans can pay. The ransom theory asserts that the suffering and death of God’s own Son on the cross is that price. God sent the Son to the earth in the person of Jesus of Nazareth for the purpose of suffering and dying to pay a price. It has that much in common with the classical theory of atonement. The difference between the two soteriologies is that while in the classical theory of atonement Christ suffers and dies to pay a price to God, in the ransom theory Christ suffers and dies to pay a price to the devil. He becomes the ransom that God must pay in order to obtain humanity’s release from the devil’s grasp.

I have never accepted the ransom theory of salvation. I haven’t for a couple of reasons. One is that it is too easy for us to take the theory literally. The church has taught Christians for centuries that there is an evil, fallen angel named Satan, called the devil, who causes humans to sin. He supposedly resides in a fiery hell in the depths of the earth, whence he emerges to entice us to do that which we ought not do. I do not believe that there is such a being. I do not believe that there is a hell in the depths of the earth or anywhere else. It is too easy for people, myself included, to see the ransom theory as requiring the literal, factual existence of Satan.

The other reason I have never accepted the ransom theory is more important. It makes this devil too powerful. According to this theory, God does not have the power simply to command the devil to release God’s people from their captivity. God has to give the devil something the devil does not have before the devil will release us. That something is the ransom greater than anything any human could pay that this theory posits is required to procure our freedom from sin. God has to do something the devil wants done not something God wants done on God’s own in order to secure human salvation. The ransom theory very nearly makes Christianity a dualistic religion like Zoroastrianism with two gods, one good and one bad, who battle continually for control of the earth. It even makes the devil in some ways more powerful than God, for it says that God had to do what the devil wants, the devil doesn’t have to do what God wants without God paying the devil an enormous ransom, the suffering and death of God’s own Son.

I cannot accept such a theological dualism. Even if there is such a creature as the devil, that creature cannot be equal to or even more powerful than God. My Christian faith is monotheistic, and so am I. I confess one God not two. I confess a God of limitless love and forgiveness. I confess a God more powerful than anything God has created. How God exercises God’s power is a thorny question I won’t go into here. The point for now is only that God has such power. There is nothing in creation that can overcome it when God chooses to use it directly and effectively. The devil, of course, if the devil exists, is something in creation. Our tradition calls the devil a fallen angel. Angels, if angels are real, may be heavenly beings, but they are not gods. They are creatures. Fallen or not, they do not have the power to resist God in any way God does not allow them to resist God.

There are numerous things going on in the world today that are pushing me toward reconsidering my rejection of the ransom theory of salvation. I’ll focus here on just one of them. It is the one that first got me thinking about that reconsideration. It is the way millions of Americans maintain their belief in and commitment to the indicted felon Donald J. Trump. It is utterly irrational for anyone at all to support Donald Trump. He is a narcissistic liar of the first order. He does not operate within the categories of true and false. He cares only about himself. He is perhaps the most cynical American politician ever. He will use anything and anyone to achieve his ends and has no loyalty to anyone but himself. He is personally immoral, especially sexually immoral. He has no actual political agenda. The only thing he really wants is personal power and ego gratification. He doesn’t understand his country’s security arrangements and threatened those arrangements when he was president. He is Vladimir Putin’s lapdog. He wants to rule the United States the way Kim Jung-un rules North Korea, that is, as a dictator with unlimited power over people’s lives. He plays fast and loose with classified information. He has been indicted in four different jurisdictions for 91 felonies. It is obvious to any who will just look at the facts that he is guilty of those felonies, or at least he’s guilty of most of them.[1] He is the least qualified and most dangerous national politician in American history or at least one of them. He is an American fascist. He neither understands nor gives a damn about the country’s constitutional system of government. He does not believe in democracy. He does not believe in the rule of law. He has made it perfectly clear that he intends to politicize the Department of Justice is he ever gets the chance. He’s already tried to do that once before. He organized a vast conspiracy in an effort to overturn the free and fair result of the 2020 presidential election, which he lost. His efforts to stay in power though he lost culminated in him sending a violent mob to attack the US Capitol in a last-ditch effort to stop Congress from certifying the results of that election. In doing so he engaged in an insurrection against the government he supposedly led. It is simply beyond comprehension how any person with a functioning brain could want him in the White House when he so obviously belongs in prison for his multiple felonies. Yet the polls today, in October, 2023, show him in a dead heat with President Biden in the 2024 presidential election. Tens of millions of Americans want to put him back in power. How is that possible? There is no rational explanation. There must be some other way of understanding that baffling phenomenon.

It has occurred to me that the ransom theory of salvation may provide that other way of understanding. Before it can do that for me, I need to make my understanding of that theory more nuanced and intellectually acceptable. I try to see the devil not as a factual creature but as a symbol for evil. He represents the way evil seems to have such power in the world. He is a symbolic explanation of why we humans are so persistently sinful. He is a way of talking about the presence and power of evil in the world. It makes no sense to take what Christianity has long said about the devil literally, that is, factually. It makes a lot more sense to take the devil as a symbol for evil.

Making the devil a symbol for evil does not lessen his power. Symbols are actually more powerful with us humans than facts are. Symbols function at a level in the human psyche deeper than the ego. The ego wants to see everything as fact because seeing everything as fact makes it easier for us to think we can manipulate everything for our own benefit; and the ego is concerned only with its own benefit. Yet we act more from hidden psychological and spiritual powers than we do from mere facts. Carl Jung called those negative realities from which we operate our “shadow.” That shadow is very real and very powerful. It controls our thoughts and actions especially when we are not aware of it and do nothing to deal with it in a constructive way. I can see the devil as a symbol for humanity’s shadow, that is, humanity’s seemingly unconquerable propensity for evil.

The only explanation that makes any sense for the Donald Trump phenomenon is that tens of millions of Americans are being held captive by their shadow. They have not dealt with it in any constructive way. Instead, they have let it stoke their fear and their anger about what they think is their position in the world. They have made Donald Trump, not the devil per se, their symbol for that fear and that anger. Donald Trump as symbol demands their loyalty despite all of the indisputable facts, and tens of millions of Americans give it to him. I find the ransom theory’s image of humans kidnapped and held captive by evil to be a compelling explanation of how that utterly irrational act is possible.

So what do we do about it? I wish I knew. The ransom theory says God paid the ultimate price to the devil to free humanity from bondage to sin. Yet it is undeniable that human sin remains one of the most powerful forces in the world. Sin, that is, evil, is one of the most powerful forces in the world. If the ransom theory is at all correct, it should be possible to bring people an understanding of how God has freed them from that power. We people of faith can preach that truth at people, but I doubt that that would have much effect. Most Trump supporters think they are Christians already. Psychologists would say we must get people to do the inner work necessary to come to terms with their shadow. I’m sure that is correct, but I don’t expect it to happen on any large scale. It never has, and I see no reason to think it will now.

So what are we to do? The only legal and moral thing I can think of to do is to crush the Trump movement at the polls. Perhaps Trump’s supporters will give up their commitment to American fascism if they become convinced that American fascism is not going to solve what they perceive to be their problems. I know of no way of crushing Trumpism at the polls other than the tried and true methods of democratic politics. Raise money. Put out appealing position papers. Go door to door passing out campaign literature. Get anti-Trump voters to vote in whatever way their jurisdiction allows them to vote. It all sounds so weak, so potentially completely ineffective. Yet it is all we’ve got. I am not at all confident that we can defeat Trump in the 2024 election. The Democrats will almost certainly nominate Joe Biden for reelection. I think he is a rather good president, but he is far from the compelling, charismatic candidate we need if we are going to beat Trump.

I am nearly in despair over the prospect of another Trump presidency, but the work of democracy is the only way we have to prevent it. I live in Washington state, and Washington state will never give its electoral votes to Trump. The 2024 election will come down to the same swing states that have determined the outcome of every presidential election at least since 2000. People who get the peril Trump represents in states like Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin must be the ones who do the work required to keep Trump out of the White House. Those of us who live in relatively safe blue states can support them from afar. We can send money. Perhaps we can mount a postcard campaign urging well-intentioned people to vote against Trump. And it all sounds so weak. I’m not at all sure it will work, but it’s all we have. Will it free the Trumpists from their captivity to evil? Only time will tell.



[1] Yes, he has a presumption of innocence. But the presumption of innocence is a legal concept that applies to the parties involved in a criminal trial. It does not apply to any of us when we consider the merit of any particular person. We are all perfectly free to say Trump is guilty as long as we’re not on the jury for one of his criminal trials, and Trump is obviously guilty of a lot.